Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam,Plantage Muidergracht 12, 1018 TV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):194-202. doi: 10.1037/a0024903. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
Two multisource studies address the interactive effects of personal and contextual variables on employees' proactive behavior. In line with previous work, we find positive main effects of transformational leadership, role breadth self-efficacy, and job autonomy on employee proactive behavior (personal initiative in Study 1 and prosocial proactive behavior in Study 2). As expected, a 3-way interaction qualifies these main effects: In situations of high autonomy, transformational leadership relates positively to proactive behavior for individuals high (but not low) on self-efficacy. Vice versa, in situations low on job autonomy, transformational leadership relates positively to proactive behavior for individuals low (but not high) on self-efficacy. This pattern is found both for self-ratings and peer-ratings of employees' proactive behavior in Study 1 and for supervisor ratings of such behavior in Study 2.
两项多源研究探讨了个人和环境变量对员工主动行为的交互影响。与之前的工作一致,我们发现变革型领导、角色广度自我效能和工作自主性对员工主动行为(研究 1 中的个人主动性和研究 2 中的亲社会主动行为)有积极的主要影响。正如预期的那样,三向交互作用限定了这些主要影响:在高自主性的情况下,变革型领导与自我效能高(但不是低)的个体的主动行为呈正相关。相反,在工作自主性低的情况下,变革型领导与自我效能低(但不是高)的个体的主动行为呈正相关。这一模式在研究 1 中员工主动行为的自我评估和同伴评估以及研究 2 中主管对这种行为的评估中都得到了证实。