Suppr超能文献

隐喻一致效应中的极性对应:结构重叠预测了在垂直空间中呈现的两极概念的分类时间。

Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space.

机构信息

Human Technology Interaction Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, IPO 1.24, PO Box 513, 5600MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):726-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024955. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that words presented on metaphor congruent locations (e.g., positive words UP on the screen and negative words DOWN on the screen) are categorized faster than words presented on metaphor incongruent locations (e.g., positive words DOWN and negative words UP). These findings have been explained in terms of an interference effect: The meaning associated with UP and DOWN vertical space can automatically interfere with the categorization of words with a metaphorically incongruent meaning. The current studies test an alternative explanation for the interaction between the vertical position of abstract concepts and the speed with which these stimuli are categorized. Research on polarity differences (basic asymmetries in the way dimensions are processed) predicts that +polar endpoints of dimensions (e.g., positive, moral, UP) are categorized faster than -polar endpoints of dimensions (e.g., negative, immoral, DOWN). Furthermore, the polarity correspondence principle predicts that stimuli where polarities correspond (e.g., positive words presented UP) provide an additional processing benefit compared to stimuli where polarities do not correspond (e.g., negative words presented UP). A meta-analysis (Study 1) shows that a polarity account provides a better explanation of reaction time patterns in previous studies than an interference explanation. An experiment (Study 2) reveals that controlling for the polarity benefit of +polar words compared to -polar words did not only remove the main effect of word polarity but also the interaction between word meaning and vertical position due to polarity correspondence. These results reveal that metaphor congruency effects should not be interpreted as automatic associations between vertical locations and word meaning but instead are more parsimoniously explained by their structural overlap in polarities.

摘要

先前的研究表明,与隐喻一致的位置(例如,屏幕上的积极词汇 UP 和消极词汇 DOWN)上呈现的词汇比与隐喻不一致的位置(例如,屏幕上的积极词汇 DOWN 和消极词汇 UP)上呈现的词汇分类更快。这些发现可以用干扰效应来解释:与 UP 和 DOWN 垂直空间相关的意义会自动干扰具有隐喻不一致意义的词汇的分类。目前的研究检验了一种替代解释,用于解释抽象概念的垂直位置与这些刺激分类速度之间的相互作用。关于极性差异(维度处理方式的基本不对称)的研究预测,维度的+极性端点(例如,积极的、道德的、向上的)比维度的-极性端点(例如,消极的、不道德的、向下的)分类更快。此外,极性对应原则预测,与极性不对应的刺激相比,极性对应的刺激(例如,向上呈现的积极词汇)提供了额外的处理优势(例如,向上呈现的消极词汇)。一项元分析(研究 1)表明,与干扰解释相比,极性解释提供了对先前研究中反应时模式的更好解释。一项实验(研究 2)表明,控制与+极性词汇相比,-极性词汇的极性优势不仅消除了词汇极性的主要效应,而且由于极性对应,也消除了词汇意义和垂直位置之间的相互作用。这些结果表明,隐喻一致性效应不应被解释为垂直位置和词汇意义之间的自动联想,而更恰当地解释为它们在极性上的结构重叠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验