• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词意与空间相互作用的高低起伏。

The highs and lows of the interaction between word meaning and space.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):964-73. doi: 10.1037/a0030467. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1037/a0030467
PMID:23148472
Abstract

We examined whether the processing of words associated with distinct spatial locations automatically biases behavior toward these locations in space. In four experiments (Ns = 30, 34, 32, 32), participants were shown stimuli denoting objects typically associated with the upper and lower regions of visual space. In Experiment 1, words were categorized as man-made or natural by pressing one of two vertically arranged keys. Reaction times were faster for trials in which response locations were congruent with the stimulus-associated locations. Experiment 2 replicated the stimulus-response congruency effect when the stimuli were presented in a pictorial format. Stimuli-space interactions therefore seem to be driven by an automatic activation of the spatial attributes associated with the stimuli, irrespective of input format. In Experiments 3 and 4, a target detection task involving only one response button was employed to examine whether the effects observed in the first two experiments were due to attentional shifts, independent of response selection processes. In both experiments, the previously observed congruence effect between words and space either diminished or vanished completely. Consequently, the results of the four experiments in the current study point to a dominant role of response-selection processes in the genesis of space-object word interactions.

摘要

我们考察了与不同空间位置相关的单词的处理是否会自动使行为偏向于这些空间位置。在四项实验中(N=30、34、32、32),参与者观看了表示通常与视觉空间上下区域相关的物体的刺激。在实验 1 中,通过按下两个垂直排列的键之一将单词分类为人造或自然。当反应位置与刺激相关位置一致时,试验的反应时间更快。实验 2 当以图片格式呈现刺激时,复制了刺激-反应一致性效应。因此,刺激-空间相互作用似乎是由与刺激相关的空间属性的自动激活驱动的,而与输入格式无关。在实验 3 和 4 中,采用仅涉及一个响应按钮的目标检测任务来检查前两个实验中观察到的效果是否归因于注意力转移,而与响应选择过程无关。在这两个实验中,先前在单词和空间之间观察到的一致性效应要么减弱,要么完全消失。因此,当前研究的四项实验结果表明,响应选择过程在空间-物体单词相互作用的产生中起着主导作用。

相似文献

1
The highs and lows of the interaction between word meaning and space.词意与空间相互作用的高低起伏。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):964-73. doi: 10.1037/a0030467. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
2
Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space.隐喻一致效应中的极性对应:结构重叠预测了在垂直空间中呈现的两极概念的分类时间。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):726-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024955. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
3
Emotional valence of spoken words influences the spatial orienting of attention.口语词汇的情感效价会影响注意力的空间定向。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):264-78. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
4
The relation between body semantics and spatial body representations.身体语义与身体空间表征之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Nov;138(3):347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
5
An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.一项关于个人周边空间和个人外部空间中视觉触觉交互作用的事件相关电位研究:空间规则的证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1550-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21109.
6
The interplay of spatial attention and memory: evidence for memory-driven spatial compatibility effects, but not for a facilitating role of attention in memory retrieval.空间注意力与记忆的相互作用:记忆驱动的空间兼容性效应的证据,但注意力在记忆检索中并无促进作用的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2124-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0157-z.
7
Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.跨感觉模式的自愿和刺激驱动的空间注意机制之间的相互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2384-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.
8
Object-based attention without awareness.基于对象的无意识注意。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):836-43. doi: 10.1177/0956797612461449. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.掩蔽刺激调节内源性空间注意转移。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):486-503. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
10
Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations.用于对象身份及其位置的集成上下文表示。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):371-88. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20027.

引用本文的文献

1
Sentence-based mental simulations: Evidence from behavioral experiments using garden-path sentences.基于句子的心理模拟:使用花园路径句的行为实验证据。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):952-965. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01367-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Experience-driven meaning affects lexical choices during language production.体验驱动的意义会影响语言产生过程中的词汇选择。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jul;76(7):1561-1584. doi: 10.1177/17470218221125425. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
The limits of automatic sensorimotor processing during word processing: investigations with repeated linguistic experience, memory consolidation during sleep, and rich linguistic learning contexts.
自动感觉运动处理在文字处理过程中的局限:基于重复语言经验、睡眠期间记忆巩固和丰富语言学习环境的研究。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1792-1803. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01620-4. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Does Perceptual Simulation Explain Spatial Effects in Word Categorization?知觉模拟能否解释词语分类中的空间效应?
Front Psychol. 2019 May 17;10:1102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01102. eCollection 2019.
5
Boundaries to grounding abstract concepts.界定抽象概念的范围。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0132.
6
Magnitude or Multitude - What Counts?数量还是数目——什么才重要?
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 12;9:522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00522. eCollection 2018.
7
Do I need to have my hands free to understand hand-related language? Investigating the functional relevance of experiential simulations.我需要解放双手才能理解与手相关的语言吗?探究体验式模拟的功能相关性。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):406-418. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0900-8. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
8
A Heavy Heart: The Association between Weight and Emotional Words.沉重的心:体重与情感词汇之间的关联
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 21;7:920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00920. eCollection 2016.
9
Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.隐含的空间意义与视觉空间偏差:概念加工对视觉目标及干扰物加工的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0150928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150928. eCollection 2016.
10
No horizontal numerical mapping in a culture with mixed-reading habits.在混合阅读习惯的文化中不存在横向数字映射。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 24;8:72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00072. eCollection 2014.