Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Ave., Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):318-23. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.100906. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
We evaluated a mobile phone application (Nutricam) for recording dietary intake. It allowed users to capture a photograph of food items before consumption and store a voice recording to explain the contents of the photograph. This information was then sent to a website where it was analysed by a dietitian. Ten adults with type 2 diabetes (BMI 24.1-47.9 kg/m(2)) recorded their intake over a three-day period using both Nutricam and a written food diary. Compared to the food diary, energy intake was under-recorded by 649 kJ (SD 810) using the mobile phone method. However, there was no trend in the difference between dietary assessment methods at levels of low or high energy intake. All subjects reported that the mobile phone system was easy to use. Six subjects found that the time taken to record using Nutricam was shorter than recording using the written diary, while two reported that it was about the same. The level of detail provided in the voice recording and food items obscured in photographs reduced the quality of the mobile phone records. Although some modifications to the mobile phone method will be necessary to improve the accuracy of self-reported intake, the system was considered an acceptable alternative to written records and has the potential to be used by adults with type 2 diabetes for monitoring dietary intake by a dietitian.
我们评估了一款用于记录饮食摄入的手机应用程序(Nutricam)。它允许用户在进食前拍摄食物照片,并存储一段语音记录来解释照片的内容。这些信息随后被发送到一个网站,由营养师进行分析。10 名 2 型糖尿病患者(BMI 24.1-47.9 kg/m²)使用 Nutricam 和书面食物日记记录了三天的摄入量。与食物日记相比,手机方法记录的能量摄入少了 649 千焦(SD 810)。然而,在低或高能量摄入水平上,饮食评估方法之间没有差异的趋势。所有受试者都表示手机系统易于使用。6 名受试者发现使用 Nutricam 记录的时间比使用书面日记记录的时间短,而有 2 名受试者则表示差不多。语音记录和照片中模糊的食物项目提供的详细程度降低了手机记录的质量。尽管需要对手机方法进行一些修改以提高自我报告摄入量的准确性,但该系统被认为是书面记录的一种可接受替代方法,并且有可能被 2 型糖尿病患者用于通过营养师监测饮食摄入。