Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan;22(1):18-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2236-x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
To compare the use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Thirty-four women with 34 invasive breast cancers underwent DWI and PET/CT before and after chemotherapy and before surgery. The percentage changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the standardised uptake value (SUV) were calculated, and the diagnostic performances for predicting pCR were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
After surgery, 7/34 patients (20.6%) were found to have pCR. A( z ) values for DWI, PET/CT and the combined use of DWI and PET/CT were 0.910, 0.873 and 0.944, respectively. The best cut-offs for differentiating pCR from non-pCR were a 54.9% increase in the ADC and a 63.9% decrease in the SUV. DWI showed 100% (7/7) sensitivity and 70.4% (19/27) specificity and PET/CT showed 100% sensitivity and 77.8% (21/27) specificity. When DWI and PET/CT were combined, there was a trend towards improved specificity compared with DWI.
DWI and FDG PET/CT show similar diagnostic accuracy for predicting pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. The combined use of DWI and FDG PET/CT has the potential to improve specificity in predicting pCR.
比较弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI)和(18)F-FDG PET/CT 在接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者中预测病理完全缓解(pCR)的作用。
34 名女性 34 例浸润性乳腺癌患者在化疗前后和手术前进行了 DWI 和 PET/CT 检查。计算表观扩散系数(ADC)和标准化摄取值(SUV)的百分比变化,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估预测 pCR 的诊断性能。
手术后,7/34 例患者(20.6%)发现 pCR。DWI、PET/CT 和 DWI 与 PET/CT 联合使用的 A(z) 值分别为 0.910、0.873 和 0.944。区分 pCR 和非 pCR 的最佳截断值为 ADC 增加 54.9%和 SUV 减少 63.9%。DWI 显示 100%(7/7)的敏感性和 70.4%(19/27)的特异性,而 PET/CT 显示 100%的敏感性和 77.8%(21/27)的特异性。当 DWI 和 PET/CT 联合使用时,与 DWI 相比,特异性有改善的趋势。
DWI 和 FDG PET/CT 在预测乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的 pCR 方面具有相似的诊断准确性。DWI 和 FDG PET/CT 的联合使用有可能提高预测 pCR 的特异性。