Suppr超能文献

多巴胺激动剂治疗创伤性脑损伤的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):1-18. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1812. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

Abstract

In the intensive care unit, dopamine agonists (DA) have been used in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients to augment or accelerate cognitive recovery and rehabilitation. However, the efficacy and safety of DA in this population is not well established. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the clinical efficacy and safety of DA in patients with TBI. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, comparing DA to either placebo, standard treatment, or another active comparator. There was no restriction for age, date, or language of publication. Sensitivity analyses were planned to evaluate the potential effect of timing of TBI, age, drugs, and year of publication on efficacy. Among the 790 citations identified, 20 RCTs evaluating methylphenidate, amantadine, and bromocriptine were eligible. Significant clinical heterogeneity was observed between and within studies, which precluded any pooling of data. Efficacy outcomes included mainly neuropsychological measures of cognitive functioning. A total of 76 different neuropsychological tests were used, but most of them (59%) only once. Only 5 studies systematically assessed safety. No trend could be drawn from the analysis of efficacy and safety. Important sources of bias in the studies were of major concern. Considering the absence of consensus regarding clinical outcome, the lack of safety assessment, and the high risk of bias in the included trials, more research is warranted before DA can be recommended in critically ill TBI patients.

摘要

在重症监护病房中,多巴胺激动剂(DA)已被用于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者,以增强或加速认知恢复和康复。然而,DA 在这一人群中的疗效和安全性尚未得到充分证实。我们对评估 TBI 患者中 DA 的临床疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,将 DA 与安慰剂、标准治疗或另一种活性对照进行比较。对年龄、日期和出版语言没有限制。计划进行敏感性分析,以评估 TBI 时间、年龄、药物和出版年份对疗效的潜在影响。在确定的 790 篇参考文献中,有 20 项评估哌醋甲酯、金刚烷胺和溴隐亭的 RCT 符合入选标准。研究之间和研究内部存在显著的临床异质性,因此无法对数据进行汇总。疗效结局主要包括认知功能的神经心理学测量。总共使用了 76 种不同的神经心理学测试,但其中大多数(59%)只使用了一次。只有 5 项研究系统地评估了安全性。从疗效和安全性分析中无法得出趋势。研究中的重要偏倚来源引起了极大的关注。考虑到对临床结局缺乏共识、缺乏安全性评估以及纳入试验的高偏倚风险,在 DA 可以推荐用于重症 TBI 患者之前,还需要进行更多的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验