• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用《测验性记忆测验(TOMM)》的试验 1 作为努力程度的筛查措施:建议的终止规则。

Use of Trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) as a screening measure of effort: suggested discontinuation rules.

机构信息

Psychology Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;25(7):1228-38. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.589409. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1080/13854046.2011.589409
PMID:21846261
Abstract

Trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) has been suggested as a screening tool, with several possible cut-off scores proposed. The purpose of the present study was to replicate the utility of previously suggested cut-off scores and to characterize neuropsychological profiles of persons who "pass" the TOMM but obtain Trial 1 scores < 45 and of persons with cognitive disorders. A total of 229 veterans were administered the TOMM as part of a neuropsychological evaluation. Trial 1 scores ≥ 41 and ≤ 25 showed good utility as discontinuation scores for adequate and poor effort, respectively, beyond which administration of additional trials were unnecessary. Findings suggest better Trial 1 performance is significantly related to better speeded mental flexibility and memory.

摘要

记忆测验(TOMM)的试验 1 已被建议作为一种筛选工具,提出了几个可能的截断分数。本研究的目的是复制先前建议的截断分数的效用,并描述通过 TOMM 但试验 1 得分<45 的人和有认知障碍的人的神经心理学特征。共有 229 名退伍军人在神经心理学评估中接受了 TOMM 测试。试验 1 得分≥41 且≤25 分别作为充分和较差努力的停用分数具有较好的效用,超过这些分数则无需进行额外的试验。研究结果表明,更好的试验 1 表现与更好的快速灵活思维和记忆能力显著相关。

相似文献

1
Use of Trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) as a screening measure of effort: suggested discontinuation rules.使用《测验性记忆测验(TOMM)》的试验 1 作为努力程度的筛查措施:建议的终止规则。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;25(7):1228-38. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.589409. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Test of memory malingering (TOMM) trial 1 as a screening measure for insufficient effort.作为努力不足筛查手段的记忆伪装测验(TOMM)试验1。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 May;21(3):511-21. doi: 10.1080/13854040600611368.
3
Utility of TOMM Trial 1 as an indicator of effort in children and adolescents.TOMM 试验 1 在儿童和青少年中作为努力指标的效用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Jan;27(1):23-9. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr086. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
Examining the Test Of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort.将记忆伪装测验试验1和词语记忆测验即时识别作为努力不足的筛查工具进行检验。
Assessment. 2007 Sep;14(3):215-22. doi: 10.1177/1073191106297617.
5
The use of all three Test of Memory Malingering trials in establishing the level of effort.在确定努力程度时使用三个记忆伪装测试中的所有三个测试。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;27(2):208-12. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr107. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
6
Abbreviated form of the test of memory malingering.
Int J Neurosci. 2006 Oct;116(10):1181-6. doi: 10.1080/00207450500514029.
7
Hit rates of adequate performance based on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) Trial 1.基于记忆伪装测试(TOMM)试验1的充分表现命中率。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2005;12(1):1-4. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1201_1.
8
The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia.记忆伪装测验(TOMM):认知功能正常、认知功能受损以及老年痴呆患者的常模数据。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Apr;19(3):455-64. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00078-7.
9
Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit.在住院癫痫监测单元中,错误数量预测了在测试记忆伪装上的表现。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):468-478. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1368715. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
10
The impact of cognitive and psychiatric impairment of psychotic disorders on the test of memory malingering (TOMM).精神障碍的认知和精神损害对记忆伪装测验(TOMM)的影响。
Assessment. 2005 Jun;12(2):123-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191105275512.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivariate Models of Performance Validity: The Erdodi Index Captures the Dual Nature of Non-Credible Responding (Continuous and Categorical).多元表现效度模型:埃尔多迪指数捕捉到不可信反应的双重性质(连续和分类)。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1467-1485. doi: 10.1177/10731911221101910. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Failed Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering and Misdiagnosis in Individuals with Early-Onset Dysexecutive Alzheimer's Disease.在早期发病的执行功能障碍阿尔茨海默病患者中,记忆伪装和误诊测试失败。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Aug 23;37(6):1199-1207. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac016.
3
Validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scale of scales in a mixed clinical sample.
验证人格评估量表(PAI)在混合临床样本中的量表。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1844-1859. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1900400. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Replication and cross-validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias scale (CBS) in a mixed clinical sample.在混合临床样本中复制和交叉验证人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CBS)。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1860-1877. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Baseline Cognitive Performance and Treatment Outcomes From Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Naturalistic Study.创伤后应激障碍认知行为疗法的基线认知表现和治疗结果:一项自然研究。
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Summer;32(3):286-293. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19020032. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Financial Incentive Does Not Affect P300 in the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) Version of the Concealed Information Test (CIT) in Malingering Detection. II. Uninstructed Subjects.经济激励不影响伪装检测中隐蔽信息测试(CIT)的复杂试验方案(CTP)版本中的P300。二、未接受指导的受试者。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 15;10:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00189. eCollection 2019.
7
Effort and neuropsychological performance in HIV-infected individuals on stable combination antiretroviral therapy.稳定联合抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗的 HIV 感染者的努力程度和神经心理学表现。
J Neurovirol. 2017 Oct;23(5):725-733. doi: 10.1007/s13365-017-0557-5. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.努力程度、症状效度测试、表现效度测试与创伤性脑损伤
Brain Inj. 2014;28(13-14):1623-38. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947627. Epub 2014 Sep 12.