Letterer H, Drescher T, Busse H J, Taute B, Nilius R
Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, DDR.
Gastroenterol J. 1990;49(4):156-9.
The fine-needle puncture under ultrasound guidance has the disadvantage that the material obtained can only be evaluated by cytology. The cutting biopsy cannula represents a compromise between the fine and the Menghini needle. In this way, small tissue cylinders can be attained. The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent the sampled specimen could be assessed by cytology or histology. Fine-needle puncture resulted in 22 (69%) out of 32 cases in material suitable for cytology. Cutting biopsy led in 34 out of 36 cases (94%) to specimen valid for histology. Thus, cutting biopsy clearly extends our diagnostic tools. It is not yet clear at present whether procedures with a higher risk - such as the Menghini puncture - can be in part replaced by alternative ones.
超声引导下细针穿刺的缺点是所获取的材料只能通过细胞学进行评估。切割活检套管针是细针和门基尼针之间的一种折衷。通过这种方式,可以获得小的组织圆柱体。本研究的目的是调查所取标本在多大程度上可以通过细胞学或组织学进行评估。32例中有22例(69%)细针穿刺获得了适合细胞学检查的材料。36例中有34例(94%)切割活检获得了适用于组织学检查的标本。因此,切割活检明显扩展了我们的诊断工具。目前尚不清楚风险较高的操作——如门基尼穿刺——是否可以部分被替代方法所取代。