Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Respirology. 2012 Jan;17(1):99-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02037.x.
Patients with OSA manifest different patterns of disease. However, this heterogeneity is more evident in patients with mild-moderate OSA than in those with severe disease and a high total AHI. We hypothesized that mild-moderate OSA can be categorized into discreet disease phenotypes, and the aim of this study was to comprehensively describe the pattern of OSA phenotypes through the use of cluster analysis techniques.
The data for 1184 consecutive patients, collected over 24 months, was analysed. Patients with a total AHI of 5-30/h were categorized according to the sleep stage and position in which they were predominantly affected. This categorization was compared with one in which patients were grouped using a K-means clustering technique with log linear modelling and cross-tabulation.
Patients with mild-moderate OSA can be categorized according to polysomnographic parameters. This clinical categorization was validated by comparison with a categorization in which patients were grouped by unsupervised K-means cluster analysis. The clinical groups identified were: (i) rapid eye movement (REM) predominant OSA, 44.6%; (ii) non-REM predominant OSA, 18.9%; (iii) supine predominant OSA, 61.9%; and (iv) intermittent OSA, 12.4%. Patients categorized as having both REM and supine predominant OSA showed characteristics of both the REM predominant and supine predominant OSA groups.
Patients with mild-moderate OSA show different polysomnographic phenotypes. This approach to categorization more appropriately reflects disease heterogeneity and the likely multiple pathophysiological processes involved in OSA.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者表现出不同的疾病模式。然而,这种异质性在轻度至中度 OSA 患者中比在重度疾病和高总 AHI 的患者中更为明显。我们假设轻度至中度 OSA 可以分为不同的疾病表型,本研究的目的是通过使用聚类分析技术全面描述 OSA 表型的模式。
分析了在 24 个月内收集的 1184 例连续患者的数据。根据总 AHI 为 5-30/h 的患者在睡眠阶段和受影响的体位上的主要表现进行分类。这种分类与使用对数线性模型和交叉表的 K-均值聚类技术将患者分组的分类进行了比较。
轻度至中度 OSA 患者可以根据多导睡眠图参数进行分类。通过与使用无监督 K-均值聚类分析将患者分组的分类进行比较,验证了这种临床分类。确定的临床组包括:(i)快速眼动(REM)为主的 OSA,占 44.6%;(ii)非 REM 为主的 OSA,占 18.9%;(iii)仰卧位为主的 OSA,占 61.9%;(iv)间歇性 OSA,占 12.4%。被归类为同时存在 REM 和仰卧位为主的 OSA 的患者表现出 REM 为主和仰卧位为主的 OSA 两组的特征。
轻度至中度 OSA 患者表现出不同的多导睡眠图表型。这种分类方法更能反映疾病的异质性和 OSA 中可能涉及的多种病理生理过程。