Nguyen Minhtri K, Kao Liyo, Kurtz Ira
Division of Nephrology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Theor Biol Med Model. 2011 Aug 17;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-8-29.
Upon the addition of protons to an aqueous solution, a component of the H+ load will be bound i.e. buffered. In an aqueous solution containing a triprotic acid, H+ can be bound to three different states of the acid as well as to OH- ions that are derived from the auto-ionization of H2O. In quantifying the buffering process of a triprotic acid, one must define the partitioning of H+ among the three states of the acid and also the OH- ions in solution in order to predict the equilibrium pH value. However, previous quantitative approaches that model triprotic acid titration behaviour and used to predict the equilibrium pH rely on the mathematical convenience of electroneutrality/charge balance considerations. This fact has caused confusion in the literature, and has led to the assumption that charge balance/electroneutrality is a causal factor in modulating proton buffering (Stewart formulation). However, as we have previously shown, although charge balance can be used mathematically as a convenient tool in deriving various formulae, electroneutrality per se is not a fundamental physicochemical parameter that is mechanistically involved in the underlying buffering and proton transfer reactions. The lack of distinction between a mathematical tool, and a fundamental physicochemical parameter is in part a reason for the current debate regarding the Stewart formulation of acid-base analysis. We therefore posed the following question: Is it possible to generate an equation that defines and predicts the buffering of a triprotic acid that is based only on H+ partitioning without incorporating electroneutrality in the derivation? Towards this goal, we derived our new equation utilizing: 1) partitioning of H+ buffering; 2) conservation of mass; and 3) acid-base equilibria. In validating this model, we compared the predicted equilibrium pH with the measured pH of an aqueous solution consisting of Na2HPO4 to which HCl was added. The measured pH values were in excellent agreement with the predictions of our equation. Our results provide further important evidence that one can mathematically model the chemistry of acid-base phenomenology without relying on electroneutrality (Stewart formulation) considerations.
向水溶液中加入质子时,一部分H⁺负荷会被结合,即被缓冲。在含有三元酸的水溶液中,H⁺可以与酸的三种不同状态结合,也可以与源自H₂O自电离的OH⁻离子结合。在量化三元酸的缓冲过程时,必须定义H⁺在酸的三种状态以及溶液中的OH⁻离子之间的分配,以便预测平衡pH值。然而,以前用于模拟三元酸滴定行为并预测平衡pH的定量方法依赖于电中性/电荷平衡考虑的数学便利性。这一事实在文献中造成了混乱,并导致了电荷平衡/电中性是调节质子缓冲的因果因素的假设(斯图尔特公式)。然而,正如我们之前所表明的,尽管电荷平衡在数学上可以用作推导各种公式的便利工具,但电中性本身并不是一个基本的物理化学参数,它在潜在的缓冲和质子转移反应中没有机制上的参与。缺乏对数学工具和基本物理化学参数的区分,部分原因是当前关于酸碱分析斯图尔特公式的争论。因此,我们提出了以下问题:是否有可能生成一个仅基于H⁺分配来定义和预测三元酸缓冲的方程,而在推导过程中不纳入电中性?为了实现这一目标,我们利用以下几点推导了我们的新方程:1)H⁺缓冲的分配;2)质量守恒;3)酸碱平衡。在验证这个模型时,我们将预测的平衡pH与由添加了HCl的Na₂HPO₄组成的水溶液的测量pH进行了比较。测量的pH值与我们方程的预测结果非常吻合。我们的结果提供了进一步的重要证据,即人们可以在不依赖电中性(斯图尔特公式)考虑的情况下,对酸碱现象学的化学过程进行数学建模。