Nguyen Minhtri K, Kao Liyo, Kurtz Ira
Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Rm. 7-155 Factor Bldg., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009 Jun;296(6):F1521-9. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.90651.2008. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
Upon the addition of protons to an aqueous solution containing multiple buffers, the final H+ concentration ([H+]) at equilibrium is determined by the partitioning of added H+ among the various buffer components. In the analysis of acid-base chemistry, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and the Stewart strong ion formulation can only describe (rather than predict) the equilibrium pH following a proton load since these formulas calculate the equilibrium pH only when the reactant concentrations at equilibrium(1) 1The term "equilibrium" refers to the steady state proton and reactant concentrations when the buffering of excess protons by the various buffers is complete. are already known. In this regard, it is simpler to directly measure the equilibrium pH rather than measure the equilibrium reactant concentrations to calculate the equilibrium pH. As these formulas cannot predict the final equilibrium [H+] following a proton load to a multiple-buffered aqueous solution, we developed a new quantitative approach for predicting the equilibrium [H+] that is based on the preequilibrium(2)2 The term "preequilibrium" refers to the initial proton and reactant concentrations immediately upon addition of protons and before the buffering of excess protons by the various buffers. concentrations of all buffers in an aqueous solution. The mathematical model used to derive our equation is based on proton transfer buffer equilibria without requiring the incorporation of electroneutrality considerations. The model consists of a quartic polynomial equation that is derived based solely on the partitioning of H+ among the various buffer components. We tested the accuracy of the model using aqueous solutions with various buffers and measured the equilibrium pH values following the addition of HCl. Our results confirmed the accuracy of our new equation (r2 = 1; measured pH vs. predicted pH), indicating that it quantitatively accounts for the underlying acid-base phenomenology.
向含有多种缓冲剂的水溶液中加入质子后,平衡时最终的H⁺浓度([H⁺])由添加的H⁺在各种缓冲剂成分之间的分配决定。在酸碱化学分析中,亨德森 - 哈塞尔巴尔赫方程和斯图尔特强离子公式只能描述(而非预测)质子负载后的平衡pH,因为这些公式仅在平衡时反应物浓度已知时才能计算平衡pH。(1)术语“平衡”是指各种缓冲剂对过量质子的缓冲完成时质子和反应物的稳态浓度。在这方面,直接测量平衡pH比测量平衡反应物浓度以计算平衡pH更简单。由于这些公式无法预测向多缓冲水溶液中加入质子后的最终平衡[H⁺],我们开发了一种基于水溶液中所有缓冲剂预平衡(2)术语“预平衡”是指加入质子后且各种缓冲剂对过量质子的缓冲作用尚未开始时的初始质子和反应物浓度。浓度来预测平衡[H⁺]的新定量方法。用于推导我们方程的数学模型基于质子转移缓冲平衡,无需纳入电中性考虑因素。该模型由一个四次多项式方程组成,该方程仅基于H⁺在各种缓冲剂成分之间的分配推导得出。我们使用含有各种缓冲剂的水溶液测试了该模型,并测量了加入HCl后的平衡pH值。我们的结果证实了我们新方程的准确性(r² = 1;测量pH与预测pH),表明它定量地解释了潜在的酸碱现象学。