• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

林奇综合征筛查实施:医疗体系的商业分析。

Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system.

机构信息

Clinical Genetics Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2011 Aug 1;17(8):e288-300.

PMID:21851136
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the current state of evidence and apply simulation modeling to support decision making about provision and coverage of a Lynch syndrome (LS) screening program among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in our integrated healthcare delivery system.

STUDY DESIGN

Application of multiple methods for synthesizing evidence guided by needs of our clinical and administrative decision makers.

METHODS

Narrative and focused reviews, computerized simulation models of multiple screening options, queries of our electronic data warehouse, and extensive communication with decision makers.

RESULTS

Review of published evidence at the time of the study period revealed that screening unselected CRC patients for LS would likely cost less than $25,000 per life-year saved (compared with no screening) and that screening with immunohistochemistry is substantially more efficient than other options. Our simulation models suggest that not only does including BRAF mutation testing substantially improve efficiency but that adding methylation testing improves it further. We characterized a variety of other metrics that contributed not only to local decisions but to the broader evidence base on this topic.

CONCLUSION

The current state of evidence at the time of the study period suggests an LS screening program can be both effective in reducing mortality from CRC and cost-effective. However, direct evidence remains limited and multiple factors could threaten success of such a program. We have identified opportunities for optimizing the efficiency of available screening protocols. While there was enough evidence for our system to proceed with an LS screening program, we recognize the threats to program success and will prospectively collect outcome data supporting empirical examination of the program.

摘要

目的

描述当前证据状况,并应用模拟建模来支持我们的综合医疗服务系统中关于结直肠癌(CRC)患者进行林奇综合征(LS)筛查计划的提供和覆盖范围的决策。

研究设计

应用多种方法综合证据,以满足我们临床和行政决策者的需求。

方法

叙述性和重点审查、多种筛查选择的计算机模拟模型、对我们的电子数据仓库的查询以及与决策者的广泛沟通。

结果

在研究期间,对已发表证据的回顾表明,对未选择的 CRC 患者进行 LS 筛查可能花费不到 25,000 美元/每挽救一个生命年(与不筛查相比),并且免疫组织化学筛查比其他选择更有效率。我们的模拟模型表明,不仅包括 BRAF 突变测试可以显著提高效率,而且添加甲基化测试可以进一步提高效率。我们还描述了其他各种指标,这些指标不仅有助于当地决策,还有助于这一主题的更广泛的证据基础。

结论

在研究期间,当前证据状况表明,LS 筛查计划既能有效降低 CRC 死亡率,又具有成本效益。然而,直接证据仍然有限,并且多种因素可能威胁到该计划的成功。我们已经确定了优化现有筛查方案效率的机会。虽然我们的系统有足够的证据可以进行 LS 筛查计划,但我们认识到计划成功的威胁,并将前瞻性地收集支持对该计划进行实证检验的结果数据。

相似文献

1
Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system.林奇综合征筛查实施:医疗体系的商业分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Aug 1;17(8):e288-300.
2
Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(51):1-238. doi: 10.3310/hta21510.
3
Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.澳大利亚结直肠癌人群中林奇综合征筛查的成本和结果。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1737-1744. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14154. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.对新发结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征系统检测的预测影响和成本效益。
Med J Aust. 2020 Feb;212(2):72-81. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50356. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.台湾林奇综合征不同基因检测策略的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160599. eCollection 2016.
6
Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征筛查策略的比较有效性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 20;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv005. Print 2015 Apr.
7
Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些林奇综合征筛查方案可以在“现实世界”中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1131-1144. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.244. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征诊断策略的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(58):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta18580.
9
Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.70岁及以下结直肠癌患者林奇综合征常规筛查的成本效益
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):966-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.206. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
10
A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.基于模型的评估:用于识别早发性结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的策略的成本-效用。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 25;15:313. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1254-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening Protocols among Newly Diagnosed Patients with Colorectal Cancer.新诊断结直肠癌患者中林奇综合征通用筛查方案的经济学评估
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):1284. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121284.
2
Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: Is the Community Willing to Pay for It?癌症风险的基因检测:社会是否愿意为此买单?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 19;18(16):8752. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168752.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotyping for HLA-B*15:02 in Indonesian patients with epilepsy using a generic model.
基于通用模型的印尼癫痫患者 HLA-B*15:02 基因分型的成本效果分析。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2021 Aug;21(4):476-483. doi: 10.1038/s41397-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Defective DNA Mismatch Repair in Small-bowel Carcinoma in a Japanese Hospital-based Population.日本某医院人群中小肠癌中DNA错配修复缺陷的患病率及分子特征
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020 Oct 29;4(4):165-173. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2020-026. eCollection 2020.
5
Implementing universal Lynch syndrome screening (IMPULSS): protocol for a multi-site study to identify strategies to implement, adapt, and sustain genomic medicine programs in different organizational contexts.实施林奇综合征通用筛查(IMPULSS):一项多中心研究方案,旨在确定在不同组织环境中实施、调整和维持基因组医学项目的策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 30;18(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3636-2.
6
Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.澳大利亚结直肠癌人群中林奇综合征筛查的成本和结果。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1737-1744. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14154. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations.结直肠癌诊断与治疗中的个性化医疗:卫生经济评估的系统综述
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jan 22;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z. eCollection 2018.
8
Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.林奇综合征的通用筛查与靶向筛查:基于临床经验比较确诊率和成本
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4218-y. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Universal Screening of Colorectal Cancers for Lynch Syndrome: Challenges and Opportunities.对林奇综合征进行结直肠癌的普遍筛查:挑战与机遇
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Apr;61(4):969-76. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3964-6. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
10
When is Genomic Testing Cost-Effective? Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer and Their Relatives.基因检测何时具有成本效益?对新诊断的结直肠癌患者及其亲属进行林奇综合征检测。
Healthcare (Basel). 2015;3(4):860-78. doi: 10.3390/healthcare3040860. Epub 2015 Sep 24.