Department of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, MRC Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical TB Research, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Jul;18(7):711-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03626.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
The measurement of early bactericidal activity (EBA) is the first step in the clinical investigation of antituberculosis agents. EBA is determined by quantifying the viable sputum mycobacterial load on consecutive days of treatment. To investigate whether time to positivity (TTP) in mycobacterial liquid culture can substitute for colony forming unit (CFU) counting on agar plates we compared the error variation of TTP and CFU in 2115 pooled sputum samples collected overnight from 250 individuals included in five EBA studies. We found that the technical variation between duplicate laboratory measurements and the within-subject or day-to-day variation were similar for TTP (8.5% and 27.4% of total variation, respectively) and CFU (6.7% and 29.3% of total variation). The ability of the measurements to separate the EBA of 22 treatment arms was determined with group rank correlation of means and one-way analysis of variance. Except for the EBA over 0-2 days, individual and group EBAs measured with TTP and CFU were highly correlated. Treatment group means rank correlation coefficients were r=0.472, r=0.910 and r=0.818, respectively, for EBA 0-2 days, EBA 0-7 days and EBA 0-14 days. Analysis of variance significantly favoured TTP over CFU for discrimination between groups with F values of 6.58 and 1.87, 7.77 and 4.58, and 8.71 and 3.56, respectively. We conclude that TTP is an acceptable alternative to CFU counting for the determination of the viable sputum mycobacterial load in EBA studies of up to 14 days duration.
早期杀菌活性(EBA)的测量是抗结核药物临床研究的第一步。EBA 通过连续几天的治疗定量测定痰液分枝杆菌的活菌负荷来确定。为了研究分枝杆菌液体培养物的阳性时间(TTP)是否可以替代琼脂平板上的集落形成单位(CFU)计数,我们比较了来自 250 名个体的 2115 个过夜收集的 pooled 痰样本中 TTP 和 CFU 的误差变异性,这些个体被纳入了五项 EBA 研究。我们发现,TTP(实验室重复测量的技术变异和个体内或每日变异分别占总变异的 8.5%和 27.4%)和 CFU(6.7%和 29.3%)之间的技术变异相似。用组均值等级相关和单向方差分析来确定测量值区分 22 个治疗臂 EBA 的能力。除了 0-2 天的 EBA 之外,TTP 和 CFU 测量的个体和组 EBA 高度相关。对于 0-2 天、0-7 天和 0-14 天的 EBA,个体和组 EBA 的治疗组平均值等级相关系数分别为 r=0.472、r=0.910 和 r=0.818。方差分析显著支持 TTP 优于 CFU 用于区分具有 F 值为 6.58 和 1.87、7.77 和 4.58 以及 8.71 和 3.56 的组。我们得出结论,TTP 是在长达 14 天的 EBA 研究中确定痰液分枝杆菌活菌负荷的 CFU 计数的可接受替代方法。