Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1894-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03290-12. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
The early bactericidal activity of antituberculosis agents is usually determined by measuring the reduction of the sputum mycobacterial load over time on solid agar medium or in liquid culture. This study investigated the value of a quantitative PCR assay for early bactericidal activity determination. Groups of 15 patients were treated with 6 different antituberculosis agents or regimens. Patients collected sputum for 16 h overnight at baseline and at days 7 and 14 after treatment initiation. We determined the sputum bacterial load by CFU counting (log CFU/ml sputum, reported as mean ± standard deviation [SD]), time to culture positivity (TTP, in hours [mean ± SD]) in liquid culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF cycle thresholds (C(T), n [mean ± SD]). The ability to discriminate treatment effects between groups was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All measurements showed a decrease in bacterial load from mean baseline (log CFU, 5.72 ± 1.00; TTP, 116.0 ± 47.6; C(T), 19.3 ± 3.88) to day 7 (log CFU, -0.26 ± 1.23, P = 0.2112; TTP, 35.5 ± 59.3, P = 0.0002; C(T), 0.55 ± 3.07, P = 0.6030) and day 14 (log CFU, -0.55 ± 1.24, P = 0.0006; TTP, 54.8 ± 86.8, P < 0.0001; C(T), 2.06 ± 4.37, P = 0.0020). The best discrimination between group effects was found with TTP at day 7 and day 14 (F = 9.012, P < 0.0001, and F = 11.580, P < 0.0001), followed by log CFU (F = 4.135, P = 0.0024, and F = 7.277, P < 0.0001). C(T) was not significantly discriminative (F = 1.995, P = 0.091, and F = 1.203, P = 0.316, respectively). Culture-based methods are superior to PCR for the quantification of early antituberculosis treatment effects in sputum.
本研究旨在探讨定量 PCR 检测在早期杀菌活性测定中的价值。将 15 例患者分为 6 组,分别接受 6 种不同的抗结核药物或方案治疗。患者在治疗开始后的第 7 天和第 14 天,分别在基线和过夜收集 16 小时痰液。通过 CFU 计数(以 CFU/ml 痰液表示,为均值±标准差[SD])、液体培养中的培养阳性时间(TTP,以小时表示,均值±SD)和 Xpert MTB/RIF 循环阈值(C(T),以 n[均值±SD])来确定痰液细菌载量。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)来分析各组之间治疗效果的差异。所有测量指标均显示,与基线相比,细菌载量在第 7 天(log CFU,-0.26 ± 1.23,P = 0.2112;TTP,35.5 ± 59.3,P = 0.0002;C(T),0.55 ± 3.07,P = 0.6030)和第 14 天(log CFU,-0.55 ± 1.24,P = 0.0006;TTP,54.8 ± 86.8,P < 0.0001;C(T),2.06 ± 4.37,P = 0.0020)均有所下降。在第 7 天和第 14 天,TTP 的组间差异最大(F = 9.012,P < 0.0001,和 F = 11.580,P < 0.0001),其次是 log CFU(F = 4.135,P = 0.0024,和 F = 7.277,P < 0.0001)。C(T) 则没有显著的鉴别能力(F = 1.995,P = 0.091,和 F = 1.203,P = 0.316)。与 PCR 相比,基于培养的方法更适合定量检测痰液中早期抗结核治疗效果。