Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1652-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2596. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
A common task in radiology interpretation is visual comparison of images. The purpose of this study was to compare traditional side-by-side and in-place (flicker) image presentation modes with advanced methods for detecting primary brain tumors on MR imaging.
We identified 66 patients with gliomas and 3 consecutive brain MR imaging examinations (a "triplet"). A display application that presented images in side-by-side mode with or without flicker display as well as display of image subtraction or automated change detection information (also with and without flicker display) was used by 3 board-certified neuroradiologists. They identified regions of brain tumor progression by using this display application. Each case was reviewed using all modes (side-by-side presentation with and without flicker, subtraction with and without flicker, and change detection with and without flicker), with results compared via a panel rating.
Automated change detection with or without flicker (P < .0027) as well as subtraction with or without flicker (P < .0027) were more sensitive to tumor progression than side-by-side presentation in cases where all 3 raters agreed. Change detection afforded the highest interrater agreement, followed by subtraction. Clinically determined time to progression was longer for cases rated as nonprogressing by using subtraction images and change-detection images both with and without flicker display mode compared with side-by-side presentation.
Automated change detection and image subtraction, with and without flicker display mode, are superior to side-by-side image comparison.
放射科诊断中的一项常见任务是对影像进行视觉比较。本研究旨在比较传统的并排(side-by-side)和实时(flicker)影像呈现模式与检测脑部磁共振成像原发性脑肿瘤的先进方法。
我们确定了 66 例脑胶质瘤患者和 3 次连续的脑部磁共振成像检查(“三联体”)。使用一种显示应用程序,以并排模式显示图像,带有或不带有实时显示,以及显示图像减影或自动变化检测信息(也带有或不带有实时显示),由 3 名经过董事会认证的神经放射科医生使用。他们使用该显示应用程序识别脑肿瘤进展的区域。使用所有模式(并排显示,带有或不带有实时显示,减影,带有或不带有实时显示,以及变化检测,带有或不带有实时显示)对每个病例进行回顾,并通过小组评分比较结果。
在所有三位评估者均同意的情况下,自动变化检测,带有或不带有实时显示(P<0.0027)以及减影,带有或不带有实时显示(P<0.0027)在检测肿瘤进展方面比并排显示更敏感。变化检测提供了最高的组内一致性,其次是减影。与并排显示相比,使用减影图像和变化检测图像(带有和不带有实时显示模式)评估为非进展性的病例,临床确定的进展时间更长。
自动变化检测和图像减影,带有和不带有实时显示模式,优于并排图像比较。