Suppr超能文献

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的随机临床试验。

Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology (W.B., D.I., D.R., A.W., J.R.), Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Department of Surgery (T.E.D.), Division of Neurosurgery.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):381-389. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7815. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stent-assisted coiling may improve angiographic results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms compared with coiling alone, but this has never been shown in a randomized trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Stenting in the Treatment of Aneurysm Trial was an investigator-led, parallel, randomized (1:1) trial conducted in 4 university hospitals. Patients with intracranial aneurysms at risk of recurrence, defined as large aneurysms (≥10 mm), postcoiling recurrent aneurysms, or small aneurysms with a wide neck (≥4 mm), were randomly allocated to stent-assisted coiling or coiling alone. The composite primary efficacy outcome was "treatment failure," defined as initial failure to treat the aneurysm; aneurysm rupture or retreatment during follow-up; death or dependency (mRS > 2); or an angiographic residual aneurysm adjudicated by an independent core laboratory at 12 months. The primary hypothesis (revised for slow accrual) was that stent-assisted coiling would decrease treatment failures from 33% to 15%, requiring 200 patients. Primary analyses were intent to treat.

RESULTS

Of 205 patients recruited between 2011 and 2021, ninety-four were allocated to stent-assisted coiling and 111 to coiling alone. The primary outcome, ascertainable in 203 patients, was reached in 28/93 patients allocated to stent-assisted coiling (30.1%; 95% CI, 21.2%-40.6%) compared with 30/110 (27.3%; 95% CI, 19.4%-36.7%) allocated to coiling alone (relative risk = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7; = .66). Poor clinical outcomes (mRS >2) occurred in 8/94 patients allocated to stent-assisted coiling (8.5%; 95% CI, 4.0%-16.6%) compared with 6/111 (5.4%; 95% CI, 2.2%-11.9%) allocated to coiling alone (relative risk = 1.6; 95% CI, 0.6%-4.4%; = .38).

CONCLUSIONS

The STAT trial did not show stent-assisted coiling to be superior to coiling alone for wide-neck, large, or recurrent unruptured aneurysms.

摘要

背景与目的

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术与单纯弹簧圈栓塞术相比,可能改善未破裂颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的血管造影结果,但这从未在随机试验中得到证实。

材料与方法

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤试验是一项由研究者主导的、平行的、随机(1:1)试验,在 4 所大学附属医院进行。具有复发风险的颅内动脉瘤患者(定义为大动脉瘤[≥10mm]、弹簧圈栓塞后复发的动脉瘤或宽颈[≥4mm]的小动脉瘤)被随机分配至支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞或单纯弹簧圈栓塞。复合主要疗效结局为“治疗失败”,定义为初始动脉瘤治疗失败;动脉瘤破裂或随访期间再次治疗;死亡或依赖(mRS>2);或在 12 个月时由独立核心实验室判定的血管造影残余动脉瘤。主要假设(为缓慢入组而修订)为支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞可将治疗失败率从 33%降至 15%,需要 200 例患者。主要分析为意向治疗。

结果

2011 年至 2021 年间共招募 205 例患者,94 例被分配至支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞组,111 例被分配至单纯弹簧圈栓塞组。主要结局在 203 例可评估的患者中达到,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞组 93 例患者中有 28 例(30.1%;95%CI,21.2%-40.6%),单纯弹簧圈栓塞组 110 例患者中有 30 例(27.3%;95%CI,19.4%-36.7%)(相对风险=1.10;95%CI,0.7-1.7; =.66)。支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞组 94 例患者中有 8 例(8.5%;95%CI,4.0%-16.6%)出现不良临床结局(mRS>2),单纯弹簧圈栓塞组 111 例患者中有 6 例(5.4%;95%CI,2.2%-11.9%)(相对风险=1.6;95%CI,0.6%-4.4; =.38)。

结论

STAT 试验未显示支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术优于单纯弹簧圈栓塞术用于宽颈、大或复发性未破裂颅内动脉瘤。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验