Suppr超能文献

对由病原体相关分子模式(PAMP)和非PAMP激发子在马铃薯中诱导产生的PTI防御谱进行比较,结果显示出不同的、激发子特异性的反应。

A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses.

作者信息

Martin Rafaela Lopes, Le Boulch Pauline, Clin Pauline, Schwarzenberg Adrián, Yvin Jean-Claude, Andrivon Didier, Nguema-Ona Eric, Val Florence

机构信息

AGROCAMPUS-OUEST, UMR IGEPP 1349-Institut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes, Rennes, France.

Centre Mondial de l'Innovation Roullier, Laboratoire de Nutrition Végétale, Pôle Stress Biotiques, Saint Malo, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236633. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Triggered Immunity or Pattern Triggered Immunity-both abbreviated to PTI. Because PTI is assumed to be a widespread and stable form of resistance to infection, understanding the mechanisms driving it becomes a major goal for the sustainable management of plant-pathogen interactions. However, the induction of PTI is complex. Our hypotheses are that (i) the recognition by the plant of PAMPs vs non-PAMP elicitors leads to specific defense profiles and (ii) the responses specifically induced by PAMPs target critical life history traits of the pathogen that produced them. We thus analyzed, using a metabolomic approach coupled with transcriptomic and hormonal analyses, the defense profiles induced in potato foliage treated with either a Concentrated Culture Filtrate (CCF) from Phytophthora infestans or two non-PAMP preparations, β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and an Ulva spp. Extract, used separately. Each elicitor induced specific defense profiles. CCF up-regulated sesquiterpenes but down-regulated sterols and phenols, notably α-chaconine, caffeoyl quinic acid and rutin, which decreased spore production of P. infestans in vitro. CCF thus induces both defense and counter-defense responses. By contrast, the Ulva extract triggered the synthesis of a large-spectrum of antimicrobial compounds through the phenylpropanoid/flavonoid pathways, while BABA targeted the primary metabolism. Hence, PTI can be regarded as a heterogeneous set of general and pathogen-specific responses triggered by the molecular signatures of each elicitor, rather than as a uniform, non-specific and broad-spectrum set of general defense reactions.

摘要

在感知到外部激发子后诱导产生的一般植物防御反应,如今被视为植物免疫反应的第一层级。根据这些分子是否参与致病性,这种防御诱导被称为病原体相关分子模式(PAMP)触发免疫或模式触发免疫——二者均简称为PTI。由于PTI被认为是一种广泛且稳定的抗感染形式,了解驱动它的机制成为植物与病原体相互作用可持续管理的一个主要目标。然而,PTI的诱导过程很复杂。我们的假说是:(i)植物对PAMP与非PAMP激发子的识别会导致特定的防御谱;(ii)由PAMP特异性诱导的反应针对产生它们的病原体的关键生活史特征。因此,我们采用代谢组学方法结合转录组学和激素分析,分析了用致病疫霉的浓缩培养滤液(CCF)或两种非PAMP制剂(β-氨基丁酸(BABA)和一种石莼属提取物)分别处理的马铃薯叶片中诱导产生的防御谱。每种激发子都诱导出特定的防御谱。CCF上调了倍半萜烯,但下调了甾醇和酚类物质,尤其是α-查茄碱、咖啡酰奎宁酸和芦丁,它们在体外降低了致病疫霉的孢子产生。因此,CCF既诱导了防御反应,也诱导了反防御反应。相比之下,石莼提取物通过苯丙烷类/类黄酮途径触发了多种抗菌化合物的合成,而BABA则针对初级代谢。因此,PTI可被视为由每种激发子的分子特征触发的一组异质性的一般和病原体特异性反应,而不是一组统一、非特异性且广谱的一般防御反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021a/7423108/e66e4dfe8a4b/pone.0236633.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验