Jacobs C, Makuch R
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5306.
J Clin Oncol. 1990 May;8(5):838-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.5.838.
To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cancer, the Head and Neck Contracts Program conducted a three-arm study comparing standard surgery and radiation, induction chemotherapy (cisplatin and bleomycin) plus standard therapy, and induction chemotherapy plus standard therapy followed by maintenance cisplatin for 6 months. As previously reported, this trial of 462 patients demonstrated no significant difference in disease-free survival or survival, but a significantly lower metastatic rate in the maintenance arm. To determine whether particular subgroups may have benefited from adjuvant therapy, we evaluated results based on primary site, and tumor (T) and node (N) stage. Of the 192 patients with oral cavity cancer, those on the maintenance arm had a significantly improved 3-year disease-free survival (67%) compared with the standard arm (49%) or induction arm (44%) (overall P = .05). For hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers there was no marked overall benefit. For the 106 patients with T1 plus T2 disease, there was marginal improvement in disease-free survival for the maintenance group (72%) compared with the standard group (47%) or induction group (43%) (overall P = .09). There was no advantage for patients with T3 and T4 disease. There was superior disease-free survival for patients with N1 disease on the maintenance arm (70%) compared with the standard arm (42%) (P = .024). The same was true for disease-free survival in 109 patients with N2 disease: standard (52%), induction (30%), maintenance (84%) (overall P less than .001). There was no benefit for N3 disease. A significant survival advantage with maintenance chemotherapy was only seen for N2 disease (overall P = .04). Since head and neck cancer patients are a heterogeneous group, there may be particular sites and stages for which adjuvant chemotherapy would be advantageous, and subset analysis can help indicate directions for new trials.
为评估辅助化疗对晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效,头颈部肿瘤协作项目开展了一项三臂研究,比较标准手术和放疗、诱导化疗(顺铂和博来霉素)加标准治疗,以及诱导化疗加标准治疗后再进行6个月的维持性顺铂治疗。如先前报道,这项纳入462例患者的试验显示,无病生存率或总生存率无显著差异,但维持治疗组的转移率显著更低。为确定特定亚组患者是否可能从辅助治疗中获益,我们根据原发部位、肿瘤(T)分期和淋巴结(N)分期评估了结果。在192例口腔癌患者中,维持治疗组的3年无病生存率(67%)显著高于标准治疗组(49%)或诱导治疗组(44%)(总体P = 0.05)。下咽癌和喉癌患者总体未显示明显获益。对于106例T1加T2期疾病患者,维持治疗组的无病生存率(72%)略高于标准治疗组(47%)或诱导治疗组(43%)(总体P = 0.09)。T3和T4期疾病患者未显示出优势。维持治疗组N1期疾病患者的无病生存率(70%)高于标准治疗组(42%)(P = 0.024)。109例N2期疾病患者的无病生存率情况也是如此:标准治疗组(52%)、诱导治疗组(30%)、维持治疗组(8