• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用共识方法确定护理和助产护理的关键绩效指标。

Identifying key performance indicators for nursing and midwifery care using a consensus approach.

机构信息

Belfast Trust/University of Ulster, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2012 Apr;21(7-8):1145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03820.x. Epub 2011 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03820.x
PMID:21854473
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to gain consensus on key performance indicators that are appropriate and relevant for nursing and midwifery practice in the current policy context.

BACKGROUND

There is continuing demand to demonstrate effectiveness and efficiency in health and social care and to communicate this at boardroom level. Whilst there is substantial literature on the use of clinical indicators and nursing metrics, there is less evidence relating to indicators that reflect the patient experience.

DESIGN

A consensus approach was used to identify relevant key performance indicators.

METHODS

A nominal group technique was used comprising two stages: a workshop involving all grades of nursing and midwifery staff in two HSC trusts in Northern Ireland (n = 50); followed by a regional Consensus Conference (n = 80). During the workshop, potential key performance indicators were identified. This was used as the basis for the Consensus Conference, which involved two rounds of consensus. Analysis was based on aggregated scores that were then ranked.

RESULTS

Stage one identified 38 potential indicators and stage two prioritised the eight top-ranked indicators as a core set for nursing and midwifery. The relevance and appropriateness of these indicators were confirmed with nurses and midwives working in a range of settings and from the perspective of service users.

CONCLUSIONS

The eight indicators identified do not conform to the majority of other nursing metrics generally reported in the literature. Furthermore, they are strategically aligned to work on the patient experience and are reflective of the fundamentals of nursing and midwifery practice, with the focus on person-centred care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses and midwives have a significant contribution to make in determining the extent to which these indicators are achieved in practice. Furthermore, measurement of such indicators provides an opportunity to evidence of the unique impact of nursing/midwifery care on the patient experience.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在就适用于当前政策背景下护理和助产实践的关键绩效指标达成共识。

背景

在卫生和社会保健领域不断需要证明其有效性和效率,并在董事会层面进行沟通。虽然有大量关于临床指标和护理指标的文献,但反映患者体验的指标证据较少。

设计

使用共识方法确定相关的关键绩效指标。

方法

采用名义群体技术,包括两个阶段:在北爱尔兰的两个 HSC 信托中涉及所有级别的护理和助产人员的研讨会(n=50);随后是区域共识会议(n=80)。在研讨会上,确定了潜在的关键绩效指标。这是共识会议的基础,共识会议涉及两轮共识。分析基于汇总分数,然后对其进行排名。

结果

第一阶段确定了 38 个潜在指标,第二阶段将排名前八的指标作为护理和助产的核心指标进行优先排序。这些指标的相关性和适当性得到了在各种环境中工作的护士和助产士以及服务使用者的认可。

结论

确定的 8 个指标与文献中通常报告的大多数其他护理指标不一致。此外,它们与改善患者体验的工作战略一致,并反映了护理和助产实践的基本原理,重点是以人为本的护理。

临床实践的相关性

护士和助产士在确定这些指标在实践中的实现程度方面可以做出重大贡献。此外,对这些指标的衡量提供了一个机会,可以证明护理/助产护理对患者体验的独特影响。

相似文献

1
Identifying key performance indicators for nursing and midwifery care using a consensus approach.采用共识方法确定护理和助产护理的关键绩效指标。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Apr;21(7-8):1145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03820.x. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
2
Evaluating the use of key performance indicators to evidence the patient experience.评估使用关键绩效指标来证明患者体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov;24(21-22):3084-94. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12899. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
3
Translating person-centred care: a case study of preceptor nurses and their teaching practices in acute care areas.以患者为中心的护理翻译:以指导护士及其在急症护理领域的教学实践为例的研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):629-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01366.x.
4
Identifying research priorities for midwifery in Ireland.确定爱尔兰助产领域的研究重点。
Midwifery. 2009 Oct;25(5):576-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.004. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
5
Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery.相互冲突的意识形态是助产工作中情绪产生的一个根源。
Midwifery. 2004 Sep;20(3):261-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2003.12.004.
6
Health care managers' perspectives on new nursing and midwifery roles: perceived impact on patient care and cost effectiveness.医疗保健管理人员对新的护理和助产士角色的看法:对患者护理和成本效益的感知影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):627-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00948.x.
7
Exploring district nursing competencies in health promotion: the use of the Delphi technique.探索社区护理在健康促进方面的能力:德尔菲法的应用。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Sep;14(8):965-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01193.x.
8
Emotion work and boundary maintenance in hospital-based midwifery.医院助产工作中的情感劳动与边界维持
Midwifery. 2005 Sep;21(3):253-66. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.007.
9
The International Confederation of Midwives essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. an update study: 2009-2010.《国际助产士联盟基本助产实践必备能力更新研究:2009-2010》。
Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 May 20.
10
Cord-care practice in Scotland.苏格兰的脐带护理做法。
Midwifery. 2000 Sep;16(3):237-45. doi: 10.1054/midw.2000.0215.

引用本文的文献

1
The contribution of a person-centred model of Lean Six Sigma to the development of a healthful culture of health systems improvement.以人为主导的精益六西格玛模式对健康系统改进的健康文化发展的贡献。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 18;5:1621233. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1621233. eCollection 2025.
2
Time is now to consider how we evaluate person-centred care-the role of patient-reported outcomes.现在是时候考虑我们如何评估以患者为中心的护理——患者报告结果的作用了。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 13;5:1578037. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1578037. eCollection 2025.
3
The Person-centred Nursing Framework: a mid-range theory for nursing practice.
以患者为中心的护理框架:一种护理实践的中程理论。
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 13:17449871241281428. doi: 10.1177/17449871241281428.
4
Development and optimisation of a mobile app (iMPAKT) for improving person-centred practice in healthcare settings: A multi-methods evaluation study.开发和优化一款用于改善医疗环境中以患者为中心的实践的移动应用程序(iMPAKT):一项多方法评估研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 29;10:20552076241271788. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271788. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Evidence Synthesis for the Development of National Nursing-Sensitive Indicators in Malaysia: A Literature Review and Stakeholder Engagement Approach.马来西亚国家护理敏感指标制定的证据综合:文献综述与利益相关者参与方法
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 14;10:23779608241286426. doi: 10.1177/23779608241286426. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Operationalising a modified Delphi study to progress quality care process nursing metrics for acute care.开展一项改良德尔菲研究,以推进急性护理质量护理过程指标。
J Res Nurs. 2022 Nov;27(7):655-676. doi: 10.1177/17449871211021138. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
The experience of staff utilizing data to evaluate and improve person-centred practice: An action research study.工作人员利用数据评估和改进以患者为中心的实践的经验:一项行动研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3457-3469. doi: 10.1111/jan.15386. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
8
Collaborative identification and prioritisation of mental health nursing care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi consensus study.协作识别和优先考虑心理健康护理流程指标:德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07659-2.
9
Nature and extent of intellectual disability nursing research in Ireland: a scoping review to inform health and health service research.爱尔兰智障护理研究的性质和范围:一项范围综述,旨在为健康和卫生服务研究提供信息。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 6;11(10):e051858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051858.
10
Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives.洞察本质:从三个开创性视角对以患者为中心的概念进行系统的范围综述与比较
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Apr 29;14:973-986. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S299765. eCollection 2021.