Suppr超能文献

医药期刊中药品广告对 FDA 指南和安全处方内容的遵从性。

Adherence of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals to FDA guidelines and content for safe prescribing.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023336. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician-directed pharmaceutical advertising is regulated in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); adherence to current FDA guidelines is unknown. Our objective was to determine adherence rates of physician-directed print advertisements in biomedical journals to FDA guidelines and describe content important for safe prescribing.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Cross-sectional analysis of November 2008 pharmaceutical advertisements within top U.S.-based biomedical journals publishing original research. We excluded advertisements for devices, over the counter medications, and disease awareness. We utilized FDA guideline items identifying unique forms of advertisement bias to categorize advertisements as adherent to FDA guidelines, possibly non-adherent to at least 1 item, or non-adherent to at least 1 item. We also evaluated advertisement content important for safe prescribing, including benefit quantification, risk information and verifiable references. All advertisements were evaluated by 2 or more investigators, with differences resolved by discussion. Twelve journals met inclusion criteria. Nine contained pharmaceutical advertisements, including 192 advertisements for 82 unique products; median 2 per product (range 1-14). Six "teaser" advertisements presented only drug names, leaving 83 full unique advertisements. Fifteen advertisements (18.1%) adhered to all FDA guidelines, 41 (49.4%) were non-adherent with at least one form of FDA-described bias, and 27 (32.5%) were possibly non-adherent due to incomplete information. Content important for safe prescribing was often incomplete; 57.8% of advertisements did not quantify serious risks, 48.2% lacked verifiable references and 28.9% failed to present adequate efficacy quantification. Study limitations included its focus on advertisements from a single month, the subjectivity of FDA guidelines themselves, and the necessary subjectivity of determinations of adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Few physician-directed print pharmaceutical advertisements adhere to all FDA guidelines; over half fail to quantify serious risks. The FDA could better protect public health by creating new more objective advertisement guidelines requiring transparent presentation of basic safety and efficacy information.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)监管医生指导的药品广告;目前尚不清楚是否遵守 FDA 指南。我们的目的是确定生物医学期刊中医生指导的印刷广告对 FDA 指南的遵守率,并描述安全处方的重要内容。

方法和发现

对 2008 年 11 月美国顶尖生物医学期刊上发表的原始研究的药品广告进行横断面分析。我们排除了设备、非处方药物和疾病意识的广告。我们利用 FDA 指南项目来识别独特形式的广告偏见,将广告分类为符合 FDA 指南、至少有 1 项不符合或至少有 1 项不符合的广告。我们还评估了安全处方的重要广告内容,包括效益量化、风险信息和可验证的参考。所有广告均由 2 名或更多研究人员进行评估,意见分歧通过讨论解决。12 种期刊符合纳入标准。其中 9 种含有药品广告,包括 82 种不同产品的 192 种广告;每种产品中位数为 2 个(范围为 1-14 个)。6 个“广告噱头”只提供了药物名称,留下了 83 个完整的独特广告。15 个广告(18.1%)符合所有 FDA 指南,41 个(49.4%)至少有一种 FDA 描述的偏见形式不符合,27 个(32.5%)由于信息不完整可能不符合。安全处方的重要内容往往不完整;57.8%的广告没有量化严重风险,48.2%的广告缺乏可验证的参考,28.9%的广告没有充分呈现疗效量化。研究局限性包括其仅关注一个月的广告、FDA 指南本身的主观性以及对遵守情况的必要主观性。

结论

很少有医生指导的印刷药品广告符合所有 FDA 指南;超过一半的广告没有量化严重风险。FDA 通过创建新的更客观的广告指南,要求透明呈现基本的安全性和疗效信息,可以更好地保护公众健康。

相似文献

1
Adherence of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals to FDA guidelines and content for safe prescribing.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023336. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Pharmaceutical advertisements in leading medical journals: experts' assessments.
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 1;116(11):912-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-11-912.
4
Direct-to-Consumer Broadcast Advertisements for Pharmaceuticals: Off-Label Promotion and Adherence to FDA Guidelines.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):651-658. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4274-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
6
Pharmaceutical advertisements in prescribing software: an analysis.
Med J Aust. 2005 Jul 18;183(2):75-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06927.x.
8
Differences in the volume of pharmaceutical advertisements between print general medical journals.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e84790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084790. eCollection 2014.
9
Evidence-based advertising? A survey of four major journals.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001 May-Jun;14(3):197-200.
10
The quantity and quality of scientific graphs in pharmaceutical advertisements.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Apr;18(4):294-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20703.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Invisible Hand of Industry.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;65(2):260-267. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000697. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
An investigation into the pharmaceutical advertising in Iranian medical journals.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Mar 7;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00415-1.
5
Off the Market: The Percentage of Products Available After Ten Years.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Jan 3;2(1):e076. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00076. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1167-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
Direct-to-Consumer Broadcast Advertisements for Pharmaceuticals: Off-Label Promotion and Adherence to FDA Guidelines.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):651-658. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4274-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
[Not Available].
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Nov;63(11):e466-e472.
9
Knowledge translation tools in preventive health care.
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Nov;63(11):853-858.
10
Quantitative Information on Oncology Prescription Drug Websites.
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Apr;33(2):371-374. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1107-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The inverse benefit law: how drug marketing undermines patient safety and public health.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Mar;101(3):399-404. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.199844. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
3
Physician attitudes toward industry: a view across the specialties.
Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;145(6):570-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.75.
4
Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review.
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 22;4(7):e6350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006350.
7
The accuracy of psychiatric medication advertisements in medical journals.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Apr;196(4):267-73. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31816a436b.
9
Drug risks and free speech--can Congress ban consumer drug ads?
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2236-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078080. Epub 2007 May 2.
10
Advertising in medical journals: should current practices change?
PLoS Med. 2006 May;3(6):e130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030130.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验