• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机测谎仪。

A stochastic lie detector.

机构信息

Institute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):222-31. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0144-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-011-0144-2
PMID:21858604
Abstract

Surveys on sensitive issues provide distorted prevalence estimates when participants fail to respond truthfully. The randomized-response technique (RRT) encourages more honest responding by adding random noise to responses, thereby removing any direct link between a participant's response and his or her true status with regard to a sensitive attribute. However, in spite of the increased confidentiality, some respondents still refuse to disclose sensitive attitudes or behaviors. To remedy this problem, we propose an extension of Mangat's (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 56, 93-95, 1994) variant of the RRT that allows for determining whether participants respond truthfully. This method offers the genuine advantage of providing undistorted prevalence estimates for sensitive attributes even if respondents fail to respond truthfully. We show how to implement the method using both closed-form equations and easily accessible free software for multinomial processing tree models. Moreover, we report the results of two survey experiments that provide evidence for the validity of our extension of Mangat's RRT approach.

摘要

当参与者未能如实回答时,对敏感问题的调查会提供扭曲的流行率估计。随机响应技术(RRT)通过向响应添加随机噪声来鼓励更诚实的响应,从而消除参与者的响应与其关于敏感属性的真实状态之间的任何直接联系。然而,尽管保密性有所提高,一些受访者仍拒绝透露敏感的态度或行为。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了对 Mangat(皇家统计学会杂志:B 辑,56,93-95,1994)的 RRT 变体的扩展,该扩展允许确定参与者是否如实回答。即使受访者未能如实回答,这种方法也提供了提供敏感属性的未扭曲流行率估计的真正优势。我们展示了如何使用多项式处理树模型的闭式方程和易于访问的免费软件来实现该方法。此外,我们报告了两项调查实验的结果,这些结果为我们对 Mangat 的 RRT 方法的扩展提供了有效性的证据。

相似文献

1
A stochastic lie detector.随机测谎仪。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):222-31. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0144-2.
2
Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.评估两种间接询问技巧的有效性:随机测谎仪与交叉模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1032-46. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0628-6.
3
Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: an extension of the randomized-response technique.减少流行病学调查中的社会赞许性反应:随机应答技术的扩展。
Epidemiology. 2010 May;21(3):379-82. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61dbc.
4
An experimental validation method for questioning techniques that assess sensitive issues.一种用于评估敏感问题的提问技巧的实验验证方法。
Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):48-54. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000226.
5
Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.在不降低效率的情况下检测不依从性:纵横模型的简单扩展。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1895-1905. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8.
6
Improving self-report measures of medication non-adherence using a cheating detection extension of the randomised-response-technique.利用随机反应技术的作弊检测扩展来改进药物不依从性的自我报告测量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Oct;20(5):489-503. doi: 10.1177/0962280210372843. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
7
Estimating the prevalence of negative attitudes towards people with disability: a comparison of direct questioning, projective questioning and randomised response.评估人们对残疾人士的负面态度的流行程度:直接提问、投射提问和随机反应的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(5):399-411. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.492067. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
8
More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.并非越多越好:随机反应技术和交叉模型的实验性个体水平验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0201770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201770. eCollection 2018.
9
More than random responding: Empirical evidence for the validity of the (Extended) Crosswise Model.不只是随机反应:(扩展)纵横交叉模型有效性的实证证据。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):716-729. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01819-2. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
10
Cheating the lie detector: faking in the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.欺骗测谎仪:在自传式内隐联想测验中作假。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):410-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02308.x. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence estimates for COVID-19-related health behaviors based on the cheating detection triangular model.基于欺骗检测三角模型的 COVID-19 相关健康行为的流行率估计。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):2523. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19819-6.
2
The analysis of randomized response "ever" and "last year" questions: A non-saturated Multinomial model.随机反应“曾经”和“去年”问题的分析:一种非饱和多项模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1335-1348. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02096-3. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
More than random responding: Empirical evidence for the validity of the (Extended) Crosswise Model.
不只是随机反应:(扩展)纵横交叉模型有效性的实证证据。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):716-729. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01819-2. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.千真万确?伪装对横交模型有效性的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0258603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258603. eCollection 2021.
5
Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model.控制社会期望偏差:扩展横断模型的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 7;15(12):e0243384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243384. eCollection 2020.
6
Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?详细的指导语和理解检查能否提高横断模型估计的有效性?
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0235403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235403. eCollection 2020.
7
More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.并非越多越好:随机反应技术和交叉模型的实验性个体水平验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0201770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201770. eCollection 2018.
8
Physical and cognitive doping in university students using the unrelated question model (UQM): Assessing the influence of the probability of receiving the sensitive question on prevalence estimation.大学生使用无关问题模型(UQM)的身体和认知兴奋剂:评估接受敏感问题的概率对患病率估计的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0197270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197270. eCollection 2018.
9
Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.在不降低效率的情况下检测不依从性:纵横模型的简单扩展。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1895-1905. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8.
10
The multidimensional randomized response design: Estimating different aspects of the same sensitive behavior.多维随机应答设计:估计同一敏感行为的不同方面。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):390-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0583-2.