Institute of Experimental Psychology, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Epidemiology. 2010 May;21(3):379-82. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61dbc.
Even though the validity of self-reports of sensitive behaviors is threatened by social desirability bias, interviews and questionnaires are widely used in epidemiologic surveys on these topics.
In the randomized-response technique, a randomization device is used to determine whether participants are asked to respond truthfully or whether they are prompted to provide a prespecified response. In this study, the randomized-response technique was extended by using a cheating-detection modification to obtain more valid data. The survey was on the dental hygiene habits of Chinese college students.
Whereas only 35% of men and 10% of women admitted to insufficient dental hygiene when questioned directly, 51% of men and 20% of women attested to this socially undesirable behavior in a randomized-response survey.
Given the considerable discrepancy between the results obtained by direct questioning and by using the randomized-response technique, we propose that this technique be considered for use in epidemiologic studies of sensitive behaviors.
尽管敏感行为的自我报告的有效性受到社会期望偏差的威胁,但访谈和问卷调查仍广泛应用于这些主题的流行病学调查中。
在随机反应技术中,使用随机装置来确定参与者是被要求如实回答还是被提示提供预定的回答。在这项研究中,通过使用欺骗检测修改来扩展随机反应技术,以获得更有效的数据。该调查是关于中国大学生的口腔卫生习惯。
直接询问时,只有 35%的男性和 10%的女性承认口腔卫生不足,而在随机反应调查中,51%的男性和 20%的女性证实了这种社会上不可取的行为。
鉴于直接询问和使用随机反应技术获得的结果之间存在相当大的差异,我们建议在敏感行为的流行病学研究中考虑使用这种技术。