Department of Dental Materials, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Oper Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;36(6):608-17. doi: 10.2341/10-386-L. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of three surface treatments on repair shear bond strength (SBS) of aged composites.
A total of 120 cylindrical samples made of a micro-hybrid composite (Clearfil AP-X) were randomly assigned to one control and three experimental groups (n=30) after water storage (3 weeks). All experimental groups included surface roughening with diamond burs. Subsequent treatments were provided as follows: group 1 - only (self-etching) bonding; group 2 - silane and bonding; and group 3 - phosphoric acid etching, silane, and bonding. The composites were repaired with the same brand and were aged (water storage [48 hours] and thermocycling [2000 cycles]). Each group was divided into two subgroups (each, n=15): new - water storage at 37°C for one week; old - water storage for six months. The SBS was tested. The fracture mode was assessed under 40× magnification.
Mean SBS values (MPa) for the study subgroups were as follows: control (new: 3.38 ± 1.6; old: 1 ± 0.76), group 1 (new: 27.3 ± 1.8; old: 25.7 ± 1.9), group 2 (new: 59.1 ± 7.9; old: 50.8 ± 4.6), and group 3 (new: 48.5 ± 8.6; old: 39 ± 3.5). Significant influence of the conditioning method and the duration of water storage was observed (p<0.01 [two-way analysis of variance {ANOVA}]). The SBS of all groups were significantly different (all p values <0.01 [Tukey]). Longer water storage time significantly reduced repair bond strength in all experimental groups (p<0.01). Although the control group and group 1 showed approximately 100% and 75% adhesive failures, respectively, groups 2 and 3, respectively, demonstrated about 75% mixed and cohesive failures. Weibull analysis showed that groups 2 and 1 had the lowest and highest probabilities of failure among the experimental groups, respectively.
All experimental groups produced acceptable SBS levels; however, use of silane and bonding systems showed the most superior results. Acid etching reduced the SBS.
本研究评估了三种表面处理方法对老化复合材料修复剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。
将 120 个圆柱形样本(Clearfil AP-X 微混合复合材料)随机分为对照组和三组实验组(每组 30 个样本),在水储存(3 周)后进行。所有实验组均用金刚砂车针进行表面粗化处理。随后的处理如下:组 1 - 仅(自酸蚀)粘结;组 2 - 硅烷偶联剂和粘结;组 3 - 磷酸酸蚀、硅烷偶联剂和粘结。用同一品牌的复合材料进行修复,并进行老化(水储存[48 小时]和热循环[2000 次])。每组分为两个亚组(每组 15 个样本):新 - 在 37°C 下储存一周;旧 - 在水中储存六个月。测试 SBS。在 40×放大倍率下评估断裂模式。
研究亚组的平均 SBS 值(MPa)如下:对照组(新:3.38 ± 1.6;旧:1 ± 0.76),组 1(新:27.3 ± 1.8;旧:25.7 ± 1.9),组 2(新:59.1 ± 7.9;旧:50.8 ± 4.6),组 3(新:48.5 ± 8.6;旧:39 ± 3.5)。观察到处理方法和水储存时间的显著影响(p<0.01[双向方差分析(ANOVA)])。所有组的 SBS 均有显著差异(所有 p 值均<0.01[Tukey])。较长的水储存时间显著降低了所有实验组的修复粘结强度(p<0.01)。尽管对照组和组 1 分别表现出约 100%和 75%的粘结剂失效,组 2 和组 3 分别表现出约 75%的混合和内聚失效。威布尔分析表明,组 2 和组 1 在实验组中具有最低和最高的失效概率。
所有实验组均产生可接受的 SBS 水平;然而,使用硅烷偶联剂和粘结系统的效果最好。酸蚀降低了 SBS。