Suppr超能文献

纳米填充复合树脂的初始修复粘结强度:表面处理和粘结剂的影响。

Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents.

作者信息

Yesilyurt Cemal, Kusgoz Adem, Bayram Mehmet, Ulker Mustafa

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(4):251-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00271.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal surface treatment is an important factor in repairing failed restorations.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different surface treatments in combination with bonding agents on the repair of an aged nano-filled resin composite.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Resin composite disks (N = 180; Filtek Supreme XT, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MO, USA), 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height, were prepared. After accelerated aging of 300 hours in a weathering tester, the specimens were randomly divided into six groups of 30 each, according to the following surface treatment methods: no surface treatment (control group, C), 38% phosphoric acid gel (PA), 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel (HF), abrasion with sodium bicarbonate particles (SB), aluminum trioxide particle abrasion (AT), and diamond bur (DB). Fresh resin composite was bonded to the treated surfaces with one of two bonding agents (Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA; Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Co./J., Morita, Japan). The effect of each surface treatment on the bond strength was determined by a shear bond test. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test (p = 0.05).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between the groups, for both surface treatment and bonding agent (p < 0.05). For all surface treatments, the shear bond strengths (SBSs) with Clearfil SE were higher than those with Prime&Bond (p < 0.05). The mean SBS values for the surface treatment groups were, from highest to lowest, 19.3 (DB), 18.7 (AT), 17.4 (SB), 15.2 (HF), 9.2 (C), and 8.8 MPa (PA).

CONCLUSIONS

Surface treatment with DB or AT was more effective than with the other surface treatments tested for the repair of nano-filled composites. The adhesive used as an intermediate agent is also important in composite repair.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Surface treatment with a diamond bur plus a proper adhesive agent is a simple, efficient, and cost-effective procedure for enhancing the shear bond strength of a repaired nano-hybrid resin composite.

摘要

背景

最佳的表面处理是修复失败修复体的一个重要因素。

目的

本研究的目的是比较不同表面处理与粘结剂联合使用对老化纳米复合树脂修复的效果。

材料与方法

制备直径6mm、高2mm的树脂复合盘(N = 180;Filtek Supreme XT,3M ESPE,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗)。在老化试验箱中加速老化300小时后,根据以下表面处理方法将标本随机分为6组,每组30个:无表面处理(对照组,C)、38%磷酸凝胶(PA)、9.6%氢氟酸凝胶(HF)、用碳酸氢钠颗粒研磨(SB)、三氧化二铝颗粒研磨(AT)和金刚砂车针(DB)。用两种粘结剂之一(Prime&Bond NT,Dentsply/Caulk,美国特拉华州米尔福德;Clearfil SE Bond,可乐丽株式会社/日本,森田)将新鲜树脂复合材料粘结到处理过的表面。通过剪切粘结试验确定每种表面处理对粘结强度的影响。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析(p = 0.05)。

结果

在表面处理和粘结剂方面,各组之间均存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。对于所有表面处理,使用Clearfil SE的剪切粘结强度(SBS)高于使用Prime&Bond的(p < 0.05)。表面处理组的平均SBS值从高到低依次为19.3(DB)、18.7(AT)、17.4(SB)、15.2(HF)、9.2(C)和8.8MPa(PA)。

结论

对于纳米复合树脂的修复,使用DB或AT进行表面处理比其他测试的表面处理更有效。用作中间剂的粘结剂在复合材料修复中也很重要。

临床意义

用金刚砂车针进行表面处理并结合适当的粘结剂是提高修复纳米混合树脂复合材料剪切粘结强度的一种简单、高效且经济有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验