• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝伐珠单抗时代转移性结直肠癌的生存情况:基于人群的分析。

Survival for metastatic colorectal cancer in the bevacizumab era: a population-based analysis.

机构信息

British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011 Jun;10(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.004
PMID:21859560
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As of 2006, bevacizumab was available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in British Columbia (BC). This study compares survival between referred patients diagnosed with mCRC in 2003/2004 (pre-bevacizumab era) and 2006 (bevacizumab era).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The BC cancer agency (BCCA) is a cancer network treating approximately 60% of patients with mCRC in BC. For this study, all patients in the BCCA diagnosed with mCRC in 2003/2004 and 2006 were included. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred seventeen patients were included: 969 from 2003/2004, and 448 from 2006. Between 2003/2004 and 2006, the proportion of patients treated with systemic therapy for mCRC increased (61.1% to 67.6%; P = .02). The only significant difference in treatment between the cohorts was in the proportion of patients who received bevacizumab (5.9% to 30.6%; P < .001). Median OS significantly differed between the 2 cohorts (13.8 to 17.3 months; P < .001). Median OS for patients who received systemic therapy increased (18.6-23.6 months; P = .001). Median OS for patients who did not receive systemic therapy was unchanged (6.1-5.9 months; P = .65).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, median OS for mCRC significantly increased between 2003/2004 and 2006. An increase in the proportion of patients treated with systemic therapy, and the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy, seem to have contributed to this improvement in survival.

摘要

背景

截至 2006 年,贝伐单抗可用于治疗不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)。本研究比较了 2003/2004 年(贝伐单抗前时代)和 2006 年(贝伐单抗时代)诊断为 mCRC 的转诊患者的生存情况。

患者和方法

BC 癌症机构(BCCA)是一个治疗 BC 中约 60%mCRC 患者的癌症网络。在这项研究中,BCCA 中所有 2003/2004 年和 2006 年诊断为 mCRC 的患者均被纳入研究。主要目的是比较两组患者的总生存(OS)。

结果

共纳入 1417 例患者:2003/2004 年组 969 例,2006 年组 448 例。2003/2004 年至 2006 年间,mCRC 系统治疗患者比例增加(61.1%至 67.6%;P=0.02)。两组间唯一显著的治疗差异是接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者比例(5.9%至 30.6%;P<0.001)。两组间中位 OS 显著不同(13.8 至 17.3 个月;P<0.001)。接受系统治疗的患者中位 OS 延长(18.6-23.6 个月;P=0.001)。未接受系统治疗的患者中位 OS 保持不变(6.1-5.9 个月;P=0.65)。

结论

在这项基于人群的研究中,2003/2004 年至 2006 年间 mCRC 的中位 OS 显著延长。接受系统治疗的患者比例增加,以及化疗中加入贝伐单抗,似乎对生存的改善有所贡献。

相似文献

1
Survival for metastatic colorectal cancer in the bevacizumab era: a population-based analysis.贝伐珠单抗时代转移性结直肠癌的生存情况:基于人群的分析。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011 Jun;10(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
2
Incremental cost-effectiveness of the pre- and post-bevacizumab eras of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy in British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌前后时代的增量成本效益。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(13):1969-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
3
Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer.结直肠癌术后肝转移患者的辅助系统化疗联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗。
Oncology. 2013;84(1):14-21. doi: 10.1159/000342429. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
4
Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE).贝伐珠单抗用于一线治疗进展后的转移性结直肠癌可延长总生存期:一项大型观察性队列研究(BRiTE)的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5326-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3212. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
5
Clinical outcomes associated with bevacizumab-containing treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the BRiTE observational cohort study.贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床结局:BRiTE观察性队列研究
Oncologist. 2009 Sep;14(9):862-70. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0071. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
6
Bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in second- and third-line settings.贝伐单抗用于二线及三线治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)。
Semin Oncol. 2006 Oct;33(5 Suppl 10):S15-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.08.003.
7
Bevacizumab-related arterial hypertension as a predictive marker in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.贝伐珠单抗相关性动脉高血压作为转移性结直肠癌患者的预测标志物。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;68(5):1207-13. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1604-1. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
8
Healthcare costs associated with bevacizumab and cetuximab in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.贝伐珠单抗和西妥昔单抗二线治疗转移性结直肠癌的相关医疗费用。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):542-52. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.596600. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
9
Circulating endothelial cells predict for response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.循环内皮细胞可预测转移性结直肠癌对贝伐珠单抗为基础的化疗的反应。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;68(3):763-8. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1543-2. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
10
Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study.奥沙利铂与氟嘧啶方案联合或不联合贝伐单抗作为转移性结直肠癌一线治疗的安全性和有效性:TREE研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3523-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4138.

引用本文的文献

1
DDR1 is identified as an immunotherapy target for microsatellite stable colon cancer by CRISPR screening.通过CRISPR筛选,DDR1被确定为微卫星稳定型结肠癌的免疫治疗靶点。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Nov 7;8(1):253. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00743-2.
2
Ratio of Pathological Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Correlates with Survival.接受完全细胞减灭术和腹腔内热化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的术前化疗病理反应与生存相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9138-9147. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10367-6. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Combined Hepatectomy with Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
联合肝切除与完全减瘤术和腹腔内热灌注化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;28(6):3320-3329. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09165-3. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Effectiveness and Costs Associated to Adding Cetuximab or Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from the Observational FABIO Project.在转移性结直肠癌初始治疗中,化疗联合西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗的有效性及成本:观察性FABIO项目的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;12(4):839. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040839.
5
Effectiveness of First-Line Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Observational Cohort Study GRETA.一线贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效:GRETA 观察性队列研究。
Oncologist. 2019 Mar;24(3):358-365. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0314. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Bevacizumab in Colorectal Cancer: Current Role in Treatment and the Potential of Biosimilars.贝伐珠单抗在结直肠癌中的应用:治疗中的现有角色和生物类似药的潜力。
Target Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(5):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s11523-017-0518-1.
7
Curative, Life-Extending, and Palliative Chemotherapy: New Outcomes Need New Names.根治性、延长生命和姑息化疗:新的疗效需要新的命名。
Oncologist. 2017 Aug;22(8):883-885. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0041. Epub 2017 May 26.
8
Patterns of practice with third-line anti-EGFR antibody for metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌三线抗表皮生长因子受体抗体的治疗模式
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):329-333. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3030. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Risk and management of venous thromboembolisms in bevacizumab-treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.贝伐单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险与管理
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2899-y. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
10
Drugs, cancer and end-of-life care: a case study of pharmaceuticalization?药物、癌症与临终关怀:药物化的一个案例研究?
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 2.