Franchi Matteo, Garau Donatella, Kirchmayer Ursula, Di Martino Mirko, Romero Marilena, De Carlo Ilenia, Scondotto Salvatore, Corrao Giovanni
National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;12(4):839. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040839.
Evidence available on the effectiveness and costs of biological therapies for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is scarce and contrasting. We conducted a population-based cohort investigation for assessing overall survival and costs associated with their use in a real-world setting. Healthcare utilization databases were used to select patients newly diagnosed with mCRC between 2010 and 2016. Those initially treated with biological therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) added to chemotherapy were propensity-score-matched to those treated with standard chemotherapy alone, and were followed up to June 30th, 2018. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and cumulative costs were compared between the two treatment arms. The study cohort included 1896 mCRC patients treated with biological therapy matched to 5678 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was 21.8 and 20.2 months, respectively. After 84 months of follow-up, RMSTs were 30.9 and 31.9 months ( = 0.193), indicating no differences between the average survival time between treatment arms. Patients treated with biological therapy were associated with higher costs. Cumulative per capita costs were €59,663 and €44,399, respectively. In our study, first-line biological therapy did not improve long-term overall survival and was associated with higher costs as compared to standard chemotherapy.
关于生物疗法用于转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)初始治疗的有效性和成本的现有证据稀缺且相互矛盾。我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,以评估其在实际应用中的总生存期和相关成本。利用医疗保健利用数据库选择2010年至2016年间新诊断为mCRC的患者。那些初始接受生物疗法(贝伐单抗或西妥昔单抗)联合化疗的患者,通过倾向评分匹配法与仅接受标准化疗的患者进行匹配,并随访至2018年6月30日。比较了两个治疗组之间的Kaplan-Meier生存估计值、受限平均生存时间(RMST)和累积成本。研究队列包括1896例接受生物疗法治疗的mCRC患者,与5678例仅接受化疗的患者进行匹配。中位总生存期分别为21.8个月和20.2个月。随访84个月后,RMST分别为30.9个月和31.9个月(P = 0.193),表明治疗组之间的平均生存时间无差异。接受生物疗法治疗的患者成本更高。人均累积成本分别为59,663欧元和44,399欧元。在我们的研究中,一线生物疗法与标准化疗相比,并未改善长期总生存期,且成本更高。