Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Aug;26(8):1074-80. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.8.1074. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
In addition to inhibiting cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may cause gastroduodenal injuries due to reactive oxygen species produced by recruited inflammatory cells. DA-9601 is a novel antioxidant with anti-inflammatory and cyto-protective effects. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of DA-9601 with misoprostol for preventing NSAID-associated gastroduodenal injury. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, noninferiority trial we compared the extents of protection of gastric and duodenal mucosae by endoscopy after 4 weeks of treatment with DA-9601 60 mg or misoprostol 200 µg three times daily, in subjects with normal baseline endoscopic findings who received an NSAID twice daily for 4 weeks. A total of 266 subjects were randomized to treatment. At week 4, the gastric protection rates with DA-9601 and misoprostol were 85.1% and 95.2%, respectively; the difference between the groups was -10.1% (var = 0.001), which was shown to indicate noninferiority of DA-9601 compared to misoprostol. Adverse events were lower in the DA-9601 group, 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0%-64.8%) than in the misoprostol group, 69.2% (95% CI, 61.3%-77.0%) (P = 0.031). DA-9601 is not inferior to misoprostol for preventing NSAID-associated gastroduodenal injury, and superior to it with respect to treatment-related side effects.
除了抑制环氧化酶和前列腺素外,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可能会因募集的炎症细胞产生的活性氧而引起胃十二指肠损伤。DA-9601 是一种具有抗炎和细胞保护作用的新型抗氧化剂。本研究旨在比较 DA-9601 与米索前列醇预防 NSAID 相关胃十二指肠损伤的疗效和安全性。在这项随机、双盲、多中心、非劣效性试验中,我们比较了在基线内镜检查正常的受试者中,4 周内每天 3 次给予 DA-9601 60mg 或米索前列醇 200μg 治疗后内镜下胃和十二指肠黏膜的保护程度,这些受试者每天接受两次 NSAID 治疗,共 4 周。共有 266 名受试者被随机分组接受治疗。第 4 周时,DA-9601 和米索前列醇的胃保护率分别为 85.1%和 95.2%;两组之间的差异为-10.1%(方差=0.001),表明 DA-9601 与米索前列醇相比具有非劣效性。DA-9601 组的不良事件发生率较低,为 56.4%(95%CI,48.0%-64.8%),而米索前列醇组为 69.2%(95%CI,61.3%-77.0%)(P=0.031)。DA-9601 预防 NSAID 相关胃十二指肠损伤的效果不劣于米索前列醇,且在治疗相关副作用方面优于米索前列醇。