Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉超声测量的可重复性。

Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2011 Nov;98(11):1517-25. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7628. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening and surveillance programmes use ultrasound imaging to measure the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the infrarenal aorta. The aim of this study was to examine potential observer bias and variability in ultrasound measurements.

METHODS

Studies were identified for review via a MEDLINE database search (1966-2009). References supplied in accessed papers were also checked for potential relevance. Consistent search terminology, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to ensure quality of data. Nine papers were available to review.

RESULTS

Variation in intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility was identified. Six studies reported intraobserver repeatability coefficients for AP aortic diameter measurements of 1·6-4·4 mm. These were below the 5-mm level regarded as acceptable by the UK and USA AAA screening programmes. Five studies had interobserver reproducibility below the level of 5 mm. Four studies, however, reported poor reproducibility (range from -2 to +5·2 to -10·5 to +10·4); these differences may have had a significant clinical impact on screening and surveillance.

CONCLUSION

The studies used different methodologies with no standardized measurement techniques. Measurements were taken by observers from different medical disciplines of varying grade and levels of training. Standard training and formal quality assurance of ultrasound measurements are important components of an effective AAA screening programme.

摘要

背景

腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查和监测计划使用超声成像来测量肾下主动脉的前后(AP)直径。本研究旨在检查超声测量中潜在的观察者偏倚和可变性。

方法

通过 MEDLINE 数据库搜索(1966-2009 年)确定了进行综述的研究。还检查了获取的论文中的参考文献,以确定其潜在相关性。使用一致的搜索术语、纳入和排除标准来确保数据的质量。有 9 篇论文可供审查。

结果

确定了观察者内重复性和观察者间可重复性的差异。六项研究报告了 AP 主动脉直径测量的观察者内重复性系数为 1.6-4.4 毫米。这些都低于英国和美国 AAA 筛查计划认为可接受的 5 毫米水平。五项研究的观察者间可重复性低于 5 毫米。然而,有四项研究报告了较差的可重复性(范围从-2 到+5.2 到-10.5 到+10.4);这些差异可能对筛查和监测有重大的临床影响。

结论

这些研究使用了不同的方法,没有标准化的测量技术。测量是由来自不同医学专业、不同级别和不同培训水平的观察者进行的。对超声测量进行标准化培训和正式的质量保证是有效 AAA 筛查计划的重要组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验