Weiler Jeffrey, Holmes Scott A, Mulla Ali, Heath Matthew
School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(5):375-81. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2011.604656. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
The authors examined whether the diminished online control of antisaccades is related to a trade-off between movement planning and control or the remapping of target properties to a mirror-symmetrical location (i.e., vector inversion). Pro- and antisaccades were examined in a standard no-delay schedule wherein target onset served as the movement imperative and a delay cuing schedule wherein responses were initiated 2,000 ms following target onset. Importantly, the delay cuing schedule was employed to equate pro- and antisaccade reaction times. Online control was evaluated by indexing the strength of trajectory amendments at normalized increments of movement time. Antisaccades exhibited fewer online corrections than prosaccades, and this result was consistent across cuing schedules. Thus, the diminished online control of antisaccades cannot be tied to a trade-off between movement planning and control. Rather, the authors propose that the intentional nature of dissociating stimulus and response (i.e., vector inversion) engenders a slow mode of cognitive control that is not optimized for fast oculomotor corrections.
作者们研究了反扫视在线控制能力的减弱是否与运动计划和控制之间的权衡有关,或者与将目标属性重新映射到镜像对称位置(即向量反转)有关。在标准无延迟范式中对顺向和反向扫视进行了研究,其中目标出现作为运动指令,以及在延迟提示范式中,在目标出现后2000毫秒启动反应。重要的是,采用延迟提示范式来使顺向和反向扫视的反应时间相等。通过在运动时间的标准化增量处索引轨迹修正的强度来评估在线控制。反扫视比顺扫视表现出更少的在线校正,并且这一结果在提示范式中是一致的。因此,反扫视在线控制能力的减弱不能与运动计划和控制之间的权衡联系起来。相反,作者们提出,分离刺激和反应的有意性质(即向量反转)产生了一种缓慢的认知控制模式,这种模式并不适合快速的眼球运动校正。