• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A quantitative study of Michigan's criminal HIV exposure law.密歇根州刑事艾滋病毒暴露法的定量研究。
AIDS Care. 2012;24(2):174-9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.603493. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
2
HIV seropositive status disclosure to prospective sex partners and criminal laws that require it: perspectives of persons living with HIV.向潜在性伴侣披露艾滋病毒血清阳性状态以及要求这样做的刑法:艾滋病毒感染者的观点。
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Sep;20(9):613-8. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008417.
3
New Jersey's HIV exposure law and the HIV-related attitudes, beliefs, and sexual and seropositive status disclosure behaviors of persons living with HIV.新泽西州的 HIV 暴露法与 HIV 相关的态度、信念以及 HIV 感染者的性传播和血清阳性状况披露行为。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2135-40. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300664. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
4
HIV-positive persons' awareness and understanding of their state's criminal HIV disclosure law.HIV 阳性者对其所在州刑事 HIV 披露法的认知和理解。
AIDS Behav. 2009 Dec;13(6):1262-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9477-y. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
5
Court upholds validity of Michigan's HIV exposure law.法院维持密歇根州艾滋病病毒暴露法的有效性。
AIDS Policy Law. 1998 Oct 2;13(18):3.
6
HIV disclosure, condom use, and awareness of HIV infection among HIV-positive, heterosexual drug injectors in St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.HIV 披露、 condom 使用和俄罗斯圣彼得堡 HIV 阳性异性恋吸毒者对 HIV 感染的认识。
AIDS Behav. 2011 Jan;15(1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9775-z.
7
Should it be illegal for HIV-positive persons to have unprotected sex without disclosure? An examination of attitudes among US men who have sex with men and the impact of state law.未披露自身感染艾滋病毒情况的艾滋病毒呈阳性者进行无保护性行为是否应属违法?对美国男同性恋者的态度及州法律影响的调查。
AIDS Care. 2010 Oct;22(10):1221-8. doi: 10.1080/09540121003668078.
8
HIV Disclosure: HIV-positive status disclosure to sexual partners among individuals receiving HIV care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.艾滋病毒披露:在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴接受艾滋病毒护理的个体向性伴侣披露艾滋病毒阳性状况。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 15;14(2):e0211967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211967. eCollection 2019.
9
Discomfort discussing HIV/AIDS and lack of awareness are barriers to partner-to-partner pre-exposure prophylaxis education.对讨论艾滋病毒/艾滋病感到不适以及缺乏认识是伴侣间暴露前预防教育的障碍。
Int J STD AIDS. 2019 Feb;30(2):147-153. doi: 10.1177/0956462418799174. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
HIV-positive men's sexual practices in the context of self-disclosure of HIV status.HIV 阳性男性在披露自身 HIV 感染状况背景下的性行为
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 May 1;27(1):79-85. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200105010-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Life and love under criminalization: The experiences of people living with HIV in Canada.在刑事定罪下的生活和爱:加拿大艾滋病毒感染者的经历。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0306894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306894. eCollection 2024.
2
Associations between HIV testing and multilevel stigmas among gay men and other men who have sex with men in nine urban centers across the United States.在美国九个城市中心的男同性恋者和其他与男性发生性关系的男性中,艾滋病毒检测与多层次耻辱感之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08572-4.
3
Historical and Current Trends in HIV Criminalization in South Carolina: Implications for the Southern HIV Epidemic.南卡罗来纳州艾滋病毒刑事定罪的历史和现状:对南部艾滋病毒流行的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Oct;23(Suppl 3):233-241. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02599-1.
4
Sword and Shield: Perceptions of law in empowering and protecting HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Manila, Philippines.剑与盾:在菲律宾马尼拉,赋予和保护感染艾滋病毒的男男性行为者权力的法律认知。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Jan;15(1):52-63. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1622762. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
HIV Testing and Mistaken Beliefs about Immigration Laws.艾滋病毒检测与对移民法的误解。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Aug;6(4):668-675. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00565-0. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Prosecution of non-disclosure of HIV status: Potential impact on HIV testing and transmission among HIV-negative men who have sex with men.起诉艾滋病病毒感染者故意不披露其艾滋病病毒状况:对艾滋病毒阴性的男男性行为者中的艾滋病病毒检测和传播的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193269. eCollection 2018.
7
A historical review of HIV prevention and care initiatives in British Columbia, Canada: 1996-2015.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省艾滋病预防和护理工作的历史回顾:1996-2015 年。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Sep 19;20(1):21941. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21941.
8
Awareness and understanding of HIV non-disclosure case law among people living with HIV who use illicit drugs in a Canadian setting.在加拿大环境中,使用非法药物的艾滋病毒感染者对艾滋病毒未披露判例法的认识和理解。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
9
Monitoring HIV-Related Laws and Policies: Lessons for AIDS and Global Health in Agenda 2030.监测与艾滋病相关的法律和政策:《2030年议程》中艾滋病与全球健康的经验教训
AIDS Behav. 2017 Jul;21(Suppl 1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1621-5.
10
Criminalization of HIV Exposure: A Review of Empirical Studies in the United States.将艾滋病毒暴露定为犯罪行为:美国实证研究综述
AIDS Behav. 2017 Jan;21(1):27-50. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1540-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Should it be illegal for HIV-positive persons to have unprotected sex without disclosure? An examination of attitudes among US men who have sex with men and the impact of state law.未披露自身感染艾滋病毒情况的艾滋病毒呈阳性者进行无保护性行为是否应属违法?对美国男同性恋者的态度及州法律影响的调查。
AIDS Care. 2010 Oct;22(10):1221-8. doi: 10.1080/09540121003668078.
2
HIV seropositive status disclosure to prospective sex partners and criminal laws that require it: perspectives of persons living with HIV.向潜在性伴侣披露艾滋病毒血清阳性状态以及要求这样做的刑法:艾滋病毒感染者的观点。
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Sep;20(9):613-8. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008417.
3
HIV-positive persons' awareness and understanding of their state's criminal HIV disclosure law.HIV 阳性者对其所在州刑事 HIV 披露法的认知和理解。
AIDS Behav. 2009 Dec;13(6):1262-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9477-y. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
4
The case against criminalization of HIV transmission.反对将艾滋病毒传播定为犯罪的理由。
JAMA. 2008 Aug 6;300(5):578-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.5.578.
5
Criminal prosecution for HIV transmission.因传播艾滋病毒而提起的刑事诉讼。
BMJ. 2006 Sep 30;333(7570):666-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38980.470093.DE.
6
Conflicting messages: how criminal HIV disclosure laws undermine public health efforts to control the spread of HIV.相互矛盾的信息:刑事HIV披露法如何破坏控制HIV传播的公共卫生努力。
AIDS Behav. 2006 Sep;10(5):451-61. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9117-3.
7
Criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission: people living with HIV respond.针对艾滋病毒传播的刑事诉讼:艾滋病毒感染者作出回应。
Int J STD AIDS. 2006 May;17(5):315-8. doi: 10.1258/095646206776790114.
8
The criminalization of HIV transmission in England and Wales: questions of law and policy.英格兰和威尔士将艾滋病病毒传播定为犯罪行为:法律与政策问题。
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2005 Aug;10(2):1, 5-12.
9
Toward rational criminal HIV exposure laws.迈向合理的刑事艾滋病毒暴露法律。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):327-37, 191-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00479.x.
10
Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior.艾滋病行为研究中的方法学问题:对性行为研究中测量误差和参与偏倚的影响。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):339-62. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339.

密歇根州刑事艾滋病毒暴露法的定量研究。

A quantitative study of Michigan's criminal HIV exposure law.

作者信息

Galletly Carol L, Pinkerton Steven D, DiFranceisco Wayne

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2012;24(2):174-9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.603493. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1080/09540121.2011.603493
PMID:21861631
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3428201/
Abstract

The objectives of the project were (1) to determine the extent to which HIV-positive persons living in Michigan were aware of and understood Michigan's criminal HIV exposure law, (2) to examine whether awareness of the law was associated with seropositive status disclosure to prospective sex partners, and, (3) to examine whether awareness of the law was associated with potential negative effects of the law on persons living with HIV (PLWH) including heightened HIV-related stigma, perceived societal hostility toward PLWH, and perceived need to conceal one's HIV infection. The study design was cross-sectional. A statewide sample of 384 PLWH in Michigan completed anonymous pen and paper surveys in 1 of 25 data collection sessions. A majority of participants were aware of Michigan's HIV exposure law. Awareness of the law was not associated with increased seropositive status disclosure to all prospective sex partners, decreased HIV transmission risk behavior, or increased perceived responsibility for HIV transmission prevention. However, awareness of the law was significantly associated with disclosure to a greater proportion of sex partners prior to respondents' first sexual interaction with that partner. Awareness of the law was not associated with increased HIV-related stigma, perceived societal hostility toward PLWH, or decreased comfort with seropositive status disclosure. Evidence of an effect of Michigan's HIV exposure law on seropositive status disclosure was mixed. Further research is needed to examine the various forms of HIV exposure laws among diverse groups of persons living with or at increased risk of acquiring HIV.

摘要

该项目的目标是

(1)确定居住在密歇根州的艾滋病毒呈阳性者对该州刑事艾滋病毒暴露法律的知晓程度和理解程度;(2)研究对该法律的知晓是否与向前性伴侣披露血清阳性状态相关;以及(3)研究对该法律的知晓是否与该法律对艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)的潜在负面影响相关,包括艾滋病毒相关耻辱感加剧、对艾滋病毒感染者的社会敌意感以及隐瞒自身艾滋病毒感染的必要性。研究设计为横断面研究。密歇根州384名艾滋病毒感染者的全州样本在25个数据收集环节中的1个环节完成了匿名纸笔调查。大多数参与者知晓密歇根州的艾滋病毒暴露法律。对该法律的知晓与向所有潜在性伴侣增加披露血清阳性状态、降低艾滋病毒传播风险行为或增加对艾滋病毒传播预防的责任感无关。然而,对该法律的知晓与在受访者与该伴侣首次发生性行为之前向更大比例的性伴侣披露情况显著相关。对该法律的知晓与艾滋病毒相关耻辱感增加、对艾滋病毒感染者的社会敌意感或血清阳性状态披露舒适度降低无关。密歇根州艾滋病毒暴露法律对血清阳性状态披露的影响证据不一。需要进一步研究,以考察不同艾滋病毒感染或感染风险增加人群中各种形式的艾滋病毒暴露法律。