Torres Mary Ann, Gruskin Sofia, Buse Kent, Erkkola Taavi, Bendaud Victoria, Alfvén Tobias
ICASO, 120 Carlton St., Suite 311, Toronto, ON, M5A 4K2, Canada.
Program on Global Health and Human Rights, Institute for Global Health University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2017 Jul;21(Suppl 1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1621-5.
The National Commitments and Policy Instrument (NCPI) has been used to monitor AIDS-related laws and policies for over 10 years. What can be learnt from this process? Analyses draw on NCPI questionnaires, NCPI responses, the UNAIDS Law Database, survey data and responses to a 2014 survey on the NCPI. The NCPI provides the first and only systematic data on country self-reported national HIV laws and policies. High NCPI reporting rates and survey responses suggest the majority of countries consider the process relevant. Combined civil society and government engagement and reporting is integral to the NCPI. NCPI experience demonstrates its importance in describing the political and legal environment for the HIV response, for programmatic reviews and to stimulate dialogue among stakeholders, but there is a need for updating and in some instances to complement results with more objective quantitative data. We identify five areas that need to be updated in the next iteration of the NCPI and argue that the NCPI approach is relevant to participatory monitoring of targets in the health and other goals of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
国家承诺与政策工具（NCPI）已被用于监测与艾滋病相关的法律和政策长达十余年。从这一过程中可以学到什么？分析借鉴了NCPI调查问卷、NCPI回复、联合国艾滋病规划署法律数据库、调查数据以及对2014年NCPI调查的回复。NCPI提供了关于各国自行报告的国家艾滋病法律和政策的首个也是唯一的系统数据。较高的NCPI报告率和调查回复表明，大多数国家认为该过程具有相关性。民间社会与政府的联合参与和报告是NCPI不可或缺的一部分。NCPI的经验表明，它在描述应对艾滋病的政治和法律环境、进行方案审查以及促进利益相关者之间的对话方面具有重要意义，但需要进行更新，并且在某些情况下要用更客观的定量数据来补充结果。我们确定了NCPI下一版本需要更新的五个领域，并认为NCPI方法与参与式监测联合国《2030年可持续发展议程》卫生及其他目标的具体目标相关。
