Safety Assessment & Laboratory Animal Resources, Merck and Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486-0004, USA.
Biomark Med. 2011 Aug;5(4):497-514. doi: 10.2217/bmm.11.52.
One promise of new translational safety biomarkers (TSBs) is their ability to demonstrate that toxicities in animal studies are monitorable at an early stage, such that human relevance of potential adverse effects of drugs can be safely and definitively evaluated in clinical trials. Another is that they would provide an earlier, more definitive and deeper insight to patient prognosis compared with conventional biomarkers. Recent experience with regulatory authorities indicates that resource demands for new TSB qualifications under the current framework are daunting and the rate of their expansion will be slow, particularly in light of mounting financial pressures on the pharmaceutical industry. Sponsors face a dilemma over engaging in safety biomarker qualification consortia. While it is clear new TSBs could be considered catalysts to drug development and that patient health, business and scientific benefits, described here using examples, should outweigh qualification costs, concerns exist that early ambiguities in biomarker interpretations at the introduction of such new TSBs might hinder drug development.
新的转化安全性生物标志物 (TSB) 的一个承诺是它们能够证明在动物研究中可以早期监测毒性,从而可以在临床试验中安全、明确地评估药物潜在不良反应的人类相关性。另一个承诺是与传统生物标志物相比,它们可以更早、更明确和更深入地了解患者的预后。最近与监管机构的经验表明,根据现行框架,对新 TSB 资格进行资源需求评估的要求令人望而生畏,而且它们的扩展速度将很慢,特别是考虑到制药行业面临越来越大的财务压力。赞助商在参与安全生物标志物资格认证联盟方面面临两难境地。虽然很明显,新的 TSB 可以被认为是药物开发的催化剂,并且患者健康、商业和科学利益(这里使用示例进行了描述)应该超过资格认证成本,但人们担心在引入此类新 TSB 时,生物标志物解释的早期模糊性可能会阻碍药物开发。