Psychology Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):1-16. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00124. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Space, time, and causality provide a natural structure for organizing our experience. These abstract categories allow us to think relationally in the most basic sense; understanding simple events requires one to represent the spatial relations among objects, the relative durations of actions or movements, and the links between causes and effects. The present fMRI study investigates the extent to which the brain distinguishes between these fundamental conceptual domains. Participants performed a 1-back task with three conditions of interest (space, time, and causality). Each condition required comparing relations between events in a simple verbal narrative. Depending on the condition, participants were instructed to either attend to the spatial, temporal, or causal characteristics of events, but between participants each particular event relation appeared in all three conditions. Contrasts compared neural activity during each condition against the remaining two and revealed how thinking about events is deconstructed neurally. Space trials recruited neural areas traditionally associated with visuospatial processing, primarily bilateral frontal and occipitoparietal networks. Causality trials activated areas previously found to underlie causal thinking and thematic role assignment, such as left medial frontal and left middle temporal gyri, respectively. Causality trials also produced activations in SMA, caudate, and cerebellum; cortical and subcortical regions associated with the perception of time at different timescales. The time contrast, however, produced no significant effects. This pattern, indicating negative results for time trials but positive effects for causality trials in areas important for time perception, motivated additional overlap analyses to further probe relations between domains. The results of these analyses suggest a closer correspondence between time and causality than between time and space.
空间、时间和因果关系为组织我们的经验提供了自然的结构。这些抽象的范畴使我们能够以最基本的关系方式进行思考;理解简单的事件需要一个人来表示物体之间的空间关系、动作或运动的相对持续时间以及因果之间的联系。本 fMRI 研究调查了大脑在多大程度上区分这些基本概念领域。参与者执行了一个 1 回任务,有三个感兴趣的条件(空间、时间和因果关系)。每个条件都需要比较简单口头叙述中事件之间的关系。根据条件的不同,参与者被指示注意事件的空间、时间或因果特征,但对于每个特定的事件关系,每个参与者都出现在所有三个条件中。对比比较了每个条件下的神经活动与其余两个条件的差异,揭示了思考事件的神经过程是如何被分解的。空间试验招募了与视觉空间处理相关的传统神经区域,主要是双侧额顶和顶枕网络。因果关系试验激活了以前发现与因果思维和主题角色分配有关的区域,例如左内侧额叶和左颞中回。因果关系试验还在 SMA、尾状核和小脑产生了激活;与不同时间尺度的时间知觉相关的皮质和皮质下区域。然而,时间对比没有产生显著的效果。这种模式表明,时间试验的结果为负,但在与时间知觉相关的重要区域中,因果关系试验的效果为正,这促使进行了额外的重叠分析,以进一步探讨领域之间的关系。这些分析的结果表明,时间和因果关系之间的对应关系比时间和空间之间的对应关系更密切。