Suppr超能文献

[应用直接免疫荧光法评估沙眼衣原体感染快速诊断的变异性]

[Evaluation of the variability of rapid diagnosis of infection by Chlamydia trachomatis using direct immunofluorescence].

作者信息

Hernández Aguado I, Ruiz-Atienza L, Fernández García I, Fernández García E, Alvarez-Dardet C

机构信息

Instituto Valenciano de Estudios en Salud Pública.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1990 Jan 13;94(1):9-11.

PMID:2186227
Abstract

The interobserver and intraobserver agreement between two microscopists was independently assessed in a blind fashion to evaluate the reproducibility of the results of the quick diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with direct immunofluorescence. The study was carried out in two phases, and 604 samples of cervical and urethral exudate from patients seen at a center for the prevention and therapy of sexually transmitted diseases were evaluated. The two observers had a kappa index of agreement between them of 0.41, with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) of 0.31-0.51, while their agreement within themselves was 0.78 (95% Cl: 0.65-0.91) for the first observer and 0.61 (95% Cl: 0.47-0.75) for the second one. After discussion of the data and analysis of the reasons of disagreement, the evaluation was repeated. In this second phase, both interobserver and intraobserver agreement were substantially improved. The kappa index was 0.71 (95% Cl: 0.61-0.80) for the former, whereas regarding the latter the first observer had a kappa index of 1 (95% Cl: 0.86-1.13) and the second observer an index of 0.82 (95% Cl: 0.61-0.80). It was concluded that the test may have problems in its practical performance if the microscopists are not previously trained with systematic programs for the evaluation of results.

摘要

以盲法独立评估了两位显微镜检查人员之间的观察者间和观察者内一致性,以评估直接免疫荧光法快速诊断沙眼衣原体感染结果的可重复性。该研究分两个阶段进行,对一家性传播疾病防治中心的604例患者的宫颈和尿道分泌物样本进行了评估。两位观察者之间的kappa一致性指数为0.41,95%置信区间(95%Cl)为0.31 - 0.51,而第一位观察者自身的一致性为0.78(95%Cl:0.65 - 0.91),第二位观察者自身的一致性为0.61(95%Cl:0.47 - 0.75)。在对数据进行讨论并分析不一致的原因后,重复进行了评估。在第二阶段,观察者间和观察者内的一致性都有了显著提高。前者的kappa指数为0.71(95%Cl:0.61 - 0.80),而对于后者,第一位观察者的kappa指数为1(95%Cl:0.86 - 1.13),第二位观察者的指数为0.82(95%Cl:0.61 - 0.80)。得出的结论是,如果显微镜检查人员没有事先接受系统的结果评估培训,该检测在实际操作中可能会有问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验