Health Psychology Section, Department of Health Science, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, HPC FA12, PO Box 196, NL-9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands.
Psychosom Med. 2011 Sep;73(7):557-62. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318227ac75. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Type D personality has been proposed as a prognostic indicator for mortality in cardiovascular disease. Most research examining this construct originates from one research group, and it is critical that the predictive value of Type D personality for adverse outcomes is independently cross-validated. This study examined its prognostic value in heart failure, relative to B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and depressive symptoms.
We studied 706 patients with complete BNP, depressive symptom, and Type D personality and mortality data from 958 patients with heart failure enrolled after hospitalization for a multisite study of a disease management program. Multivariable models were adjusted for BNP and depression.
At 18 months, there were 192 deaths (27.2%). No evidence was found for a prognostic value of Type D personality in the unadjusted model (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.893, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.582-1.370). In contrast, BNP was significantly predictive of mortality (HR = 1.588, 95% CI = 1.391-1.812), whereas depression was not (HR = 1.011, 95% CI = 0.998-1.024). Type D was also not predictive in covariate-adjusted models (HR = 0.779, 95% CI = 0.489-1.242). Similar results were obtained when analyzing Type D as the interaction between continuous z scores of its two components, negative affectivity and social inhibition (p = .144).
In the largest study to date, Type D does not predict mortality. Future research should construe Type D as the interaction of continuous negative affectivity and social inhibition z scores, rather than as a typology, and consider analyses replacing negative affectivity with depression.
D 型人格已被提出作为心血管疾病死亡率的预后指标。大多数研究这一结构的研究都来自于一个研究小组,因此,D 型人格对不良结局的预测价值需要经过独立的交叉验证是至关重要的。本研究在心力衰竭中检验了其预后价值,同时也考虑了 B 型利钠肽(BNP)和抑郁症状。
我们研究了来自多中心疾病管理项目住院后进行的心力衰竭研究中,706 名患者的完整 BNP、抑郁症状和 D 型人格以及死亡率数据,共纳入 958 名心力衰竭患者。多变量模型调整了 BNP 和抑郁症状。
在 18 个月时,有 192 人死亡(27.2%)。在未调整模型中,D 型人格没有预后价值的证据(危险比[HR] = 0.893,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.582-1.370)。相比之下,BNP 显著预测死亡率(HR = 1.588,95% CI = 1.391-1.812),而抑郁症状则没有(HR = 1.011,95% CI = 0.998-1.024)。在协变量调整模型中,D 型人格也没有预测作用(HR = 0.779,95% CI = 0.489-1.242)。当分析 D 型人格作为其两个组成部分(负性情感和社交抑制)的连续 z 分数的交互作用时,也得到了类似的结果(p =.144)。
在迄今为止最大的研究中,D 型人格不能预测死亡率。未来的研究应该将 D 型人格理解为连续负性情感和社交抑制 z 分数的相互作用,而不是作为一种类型学,并且考虑用抑郁症状替代负性情感进行分析。