Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Paulo Gama 110, Porto Alegre, RS 90040-060, Brazil.
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011 Aug 23;7(10):567-77. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.110.
Vascular calcification is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and has a progressive course. Several cardiovascular and uremia-related risk factors, such as abnormalities in mineral metabolism, contribute to the development of vascular calcification, although the pathophysiological mechanisms are still unclear. The presence and extent of vascular calcification is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. By contrast, patients who do not have calcification seem to have a good prognosis, with minimal or no calcification progression over an extended period of time. A number of noninvasive imaging methods are available to detect vascular calcification and may help clinicians to make therapeutic decisions. Cardiac CT remains the reference standard to detect and quantify coronary artery, aortic and cardiac valve calcification. However, the high cost of equipment, the inability to perform in-office testing and the expertise required limit its use on a routine basis. Other imaging methods, such as planar X-ray, ultrasound and echocardiography, are appropriate alternatives to evaluate vascular and valvular calcification. In this review, we discuss the noninvasive imaging methods most frequently used to assess vascular and valvular calcification, with their advantages and limitations.
血管钙化在慢性肾脏病患者中非常普遍,且呈进行性发展。尽管其病理生理机制尚不清楚,但几种心血管和尿毒症相关的危险因素,如矿物质代谢异常,会促进血管钙化的发生。血管钙化的存在和程度与心血管事件和死亡率的增加相关。相比之下,没有钙化的患者似乎预后良好,在较长时间内,钙化进展很少或没有。有许多非侵入性成像方法可用于检测血管钙化,并有助于临床医生做出治疗决策。心脏 CT 仍然是检测和量化冠状动脉、主动脉和心瓣膜钙化的参考标准。然而,设备成本高、无法在办公室进行检测以及所需的专业知识限制了其常规使用。其他成像方法,如平面 X 射线、超声和超声心动图,是评估血管和瓣膜钙化的合适替代方法。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了最常用于评估血管和瓣膜钙化的非侵入性成像方法,及其优缺点。