• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

["一个意味着新起点的决定……:从凯撒·威廉人类学、人类遗传学与优生学研究所到马克斯·普朗克分子遗传学研究所"]

["A decision meaning a new foundation...": from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics and Eugenics to the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics].

作者信息

Sachse Carola

机构信息

Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Universität Wien, Wien.

出版信息

Medizinhist J. 2011;46(1):24-50.

PMID:21863699
Abstract

The Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (MPIMG) in Berlin-Dahlem dates its establishment to 1964. Its homepage makes no mention of its predecessor institutes, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics and Eugenics (KWIA) and the subsequent MPI for Comparative Genetics and Hereditary Pathology (MPIVEE). This article traces the two critical phases of transition regarding the constellations of academic staff, institutional and epistemic ruptures and continuities specific to the era. Only one of the five department heads from the final war years, Hans Nachtsheim, remained a researcher within the Max Planck Society (MPG); he nevertheless continued to advocate the pre-war and wartime eugenic agenda in the life sciences and social policy. The generational change of 1959/60 became a massive struggle within the institute, in which microbial genetics (with Fritz Kaudewitz) was pitted against human genetics (with Friedrich Vogel) and managed to establish itself after a fresh change in personnel in 1964/65. For the Dahlem institute, this involved a far-reaching reorientation of its research, but for the genetically oriented life sciences in the Max Planck Society as a whole it only meant that molecular biology, which was already being pursued in the West German institutes, gained an additional facility. With this realignment of research traditions, the Society was able to draw a line under the Nazi past without having to address it head-on.

摘要

位于柏林-达勒姆的马克斯·普朗克分子遗传学研究所(MPIMG)的成立可追溯到1964年。其主页未提及它的前身机构,即威廉皇帝人类学、人类遗传学与优生学研究所(KWIA)以及后来的马克斯·普朗克比较遗传学与遗传病理学研究所(MPIVEE)。本文追溯了学术人员构成、机构和认知方面的断裂与延续等特定于该时代的两个关键转型阶段。在战争末期的五位部门负责人中,只有汉斯·纳赫特海姆在马克斯·普朗克学会(MPG)内仍为研究人员;然而,他仍继续在生命科学和社会政策方面倡导战前及战时的优生议程。1959/60年的代际更替在该研究所内引发了一场激烈斗争,其中微生物遗传学(以弗里茨·考德维茨为首)与人类遗传学(以弗里德里希·福格尔为首)相互竞争,并且在1964/65年人员重新变动后得以立足。对达勒姆研究所而言,这涉及到其研究方向的深远调整,但对整个马克斯·普朗克学会中以遗传学为导向的生命科学来说,这仅仅意味着在西德各研究所中已在开展的分子生物学又增添了一个研究机构。随着研究传统的这种重新调整,学会得以在纳粹历史问题上划清界限,而无需直面应对。

相似文献

1
["A decision meaning a new foundation...": from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics and Eugenics to the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics].["一个意味着新起点的决定……:从凯撒·威廉人类学、人类遗传学与优生学研究所到马克斯·普朗克分子遗传学研究所"]
Medizinhist J. 2011;46(1):24-50.
2
The Nazi symbiosis: politics and human genetics at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.纳粹共生现象:威廉皇帝研究所的政治与人类遗传学
Endeavour. 2004 Dec;28(4):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.10.004.
3
[The history of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society during the Third Reich. Interim reports of the president's commission of the Max Planck Society].[威廉皇帝学会在第三帝国时期的历史。马克斯·普朗克学会主席委员会的中期报告]
Nervenarzt. 2002 Nov;73(11):1107-11. doi: 10.1007/s00115-002-1426-9.
4
Human genetics and politics as mutually beneficial resources: The case of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics during the Third Reich.人类遗传学与政治作为互利资源:第三帝国时期的威廉皇帝人类学、人类遗传与优生学研究所案例
J Hist Biol. 2006 Spring;39(1):41-88. doi: 10.1007/s10739-005-6532-7.
5
Human heredity and politics: A comparative institutional study of the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor (United States), the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (Germany), and the Maxim Gorky Medical Genetics Institute (USSR).人类遗传与政治:对美国冷泉港优生学记录办公室、德国威廉皇帝人类学、人类遗传与优生学研究所和苏联马克西姆·高尔基医学遗传学研究所的比较制度研究
Osiris. 2005;20:232-62. doi: 10.1086/649420.
6
[Geneticists in the service of war? The German Research Foundation, the Reich Research Council, and policy changes in research on heredity].[遗传学家为战争服务?德国研究基金会、帝国研究理事会与遗传研究政策的变化]
Medizinhist J. 2005;40(2):141-68.
7
Weimar eugenics: the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, human heredity and eugenics in social context.
Ann Sci. 1985 May;42(3):303-18. doi: 10.1080/00033798500200221.
8
The case of Heinrich Wilhelm Poll (1877-1939): a German-Jewish geneticist, eugenicist, twin researcher, and victim of the Nazis.
J Hist Biol. 2008 Spring;41(1):1-35. doi: 10.1007/s10739-007-9122-z.
9
The problematic legacy of victim specimens from the Nazi era: Identifying the persons behind the specimens at the Max Planck Institutes for Brain Research and of Psychiatry.纳粹时代受害者标本的遗留问题:在马克斯·普朗克脑研究所和精神病学研究所确定标本背后的人。
J Hist Neurosci. 2023 Apr-Jun;32(2):218-239. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2021.1959185. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
10
One hundred years of the Fritz Haber Institute.一百年的弗里茨·哈伯研究所。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Oct 17;50(43):10022-49. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104792. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
In the Circulation Sphere of the Biomolecular Age: Economics and Gender Matter.在生物分子时代的循环圈中:经济和性别很重要。
Ber Wiss. 2022 Sep;45(3):355-372. doi: 10.1002/bewi.202200043.
2
Whose Turn? Chromosome Research and the Study of the Human Genome.轮到谁了?染色体研究与人类基因组研究。
J Hist Biol. 2018 Dec;51(4):631-655. doi: 10.1007/s10739-017-9486-7.