Sachse Carola
Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Universität Wien, Wien.
Medizinhist J. 2011;46(1):24-50.
The Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (MPIMG) in Berlin-Dahlem dates its establishment to 1964. Its homepage makes no mention of its predecessor institutes, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics and Eugenics (KWIA) and the subsequent MPI for Comparative Genetics and Hereditary Pathology (MPIVEE). This article traces the two critical phases of transition regarding the constellations of academic staff, institutional and epistemic ruptures and continuities specific to the era. Only one of the five department heads from the final war years, Hans Nachtsheim, remained a researcher within the Max Planck Society (MPG); he nevertheless continued to advocate the pre-war and wartime eugenic agenda in the life sciences and social policy. The generational change of 1959/60 became a massive struggle within the institute, in which microbial genetics (with Fritz Kaudewitz) was pitted against human genetics (with Friedrich Vogel) and managed to establish itself after a fresh change in personnel in 1964/65. For the Dahlem institute, this involved a far-reaching reorientation of its research, but for the genetically oriented life sciences in the Max Planck Society as a whole it only meant that molecular biology, which was already being pursued in the West German institutes, gained an additional facility. With this realignment of research traditions, the Society was able to draw a line under the Nazi past without having to address it head-on.
位于柏林-达勒姆的马克斯·普朗克分子遗传学研究所(MPIMG)的成立可追溯到1964年。其主页未提及它的前身机构,即威廉皇帝人类学、人类遗传学与优生学研究所(KWIA)以及后来的马克斯·普朗克比较遗传学与遗传病理学研究所(MPIVEE)。本文追溯了学术人员构成、机构和认知方面的断裂与延续等特定于该时代的两个关键转型阶段。在战争末期的五位部门负责人中,只有汉斯·纳赫特海姆在马克斯·普朗克学会(MPG)内仍为研究人员;然而,他仍继续在生命科学和社会政策方面倡导战前及战时的优生议程。1959/60年的代际更替在该研究所内引发了一场激烈斗争,其中微生物遗传学(以弗里茨·考德维茨为首)与人类遗传学(以弗里德里希·福格尔为首)相互竞争,并且在1964/65年人员重新变动后得以立足。对达勒姆研究所而言,这涉及到其研究方向的深远调整,但对整个马克斯·普朗克学会中以遗传学为导向的生命科学来说,这仅仅意味着在西德各研究所中已在开展的分子生物学又增添了一个研究机构。随着研究传统的这种重新调整,学会得以在纳粹历史问题上划清界限,而无需直面应对。