Suppr超能文献

Late clinical testing of cognition enhancers: demonstration of efficacy.

作者信息

Schwartz G, Bisserbe J C, Bradford D, Sennef C, Hollister L

机构信息

Janssen Research Foundation, Piscataway.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990 Feb;23 Suppl 2:60-2; discussion 63-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014535.

Abstract

The major difference between clinical trials for efficacy and Phase I trials is their duration; clinical trials of cognition enhancers, for example in senile dementia, require at least 6 months. Because no widely accepted treatment is available, the methodology for these trials is still in a the process of refinement. Double blind placebo-controlled trials are considered to be mandatory particularly by the FDA. Parallel group designs seem preferable and the so-called "enriched design" seems to possess advantages over more classical procedures. Outcome measures should include ratings by clinicians and family members. Self-reports are considered to be unreliable in Alzheimer patients but may be less problematic in AAMI. Psychometric tests of cognition and motor skill should also be included. An essential and pragmatic outcome criterion is, however, the quality of daily life.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验