Hall S T, Puech A, Schaffler K, Wesnes K, Gamzu E R
Glaxo Group Research, Clinical Pharmacology, Greenford, England.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990 Feb;23 Suppl 2:57-8; discussion 59. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014534.
The major problem in predicting clinical efficacy from animal experimental results and phase I data is the lack of resemblance between the models used and the clinical condition. This problem is complicated by the diversity of the potential mechanisms of action of new compounds. A further question is whether Phase I studies should be used as predictors of clinical efficacy at all. Should they be used simply for determining pharmacologically active dose ranges and tolerance? If used as predictors should drug development stop if negative results are obtained? These questions were not resolved. It was nonetheless suggested that some human models (e.g. scopolamine-induced amnesia, hypoxia-induced performance deficits) were indeed potential predictors of clinical response and, in addition, were analogous to similar models in animals. On the other hand characterisation of quantified EEG (QEEG) profiles remained controversial.
从动物实验结果和一期数据预测临床疗效的主要问题在于所使用的模型与临床情况缺乏相似性。新化合物潜在作用机制的多样性使这个问题变得更加复杂。另一个问题是一期研究是否根本就应用作临床疗效的预测指标。它们是否仅应用于确定药理活性剂量范围和耐受性?如果用作预测指标,若获得阴性结果,药物研发是否应停止?这些问题尚未得到解决。尽管如此,有人认为一些人体模型(如东莨菪碱诱发的失忆、缺氧诱发的行为缺陷)确实是临床反应的潜在预测指标,此外,这些模型与动物中的类似模型相似。另一方面,定量脑电图(QEEG)图谱的特征描述仍存在争议。