Luther Vishal, Showkathali Refai, Gamma Reto
Department of Medicine, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, Magdala Avenue, London, N19 5NF, UK.
J Med Case Rep. 2011 Aug 24;5:408. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-408.
Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction secondary to atherosclerotic plaque rupture is a common medical emergency. This condition is effectively managed with percutaneous coronary intervention or thrombolysis. We report a rare case of acute myocardial infarction secondary to coronary embolisation of valvular vegetation in a patient with infective endocarditis, and we highlight how the management of this phenomenon may not be the same.
A 73-year-old British Caucasian man with previous tissue aortic valve replacement was diagnosed with and treated for infective endocarditis of his native mitral valve. His condition deteriorated in hospital and repeat echocardiography revealed migration of vegetation to his aortic valve. Whilst waiting for surgery, our patient developed severe central crushing chest pain with associated anterior ST segment elevation on his electrocardiogram. Our patient had no history or risk factors for ischaemic heart disease. It was likely that coronary embolisation of part of the vegetation had occurred. Thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention treatments were not performed in this setting and a plan was made for urgent surgical intervention. However, our patient deteriorated rapidly and unfortunately died.
Clinicians need to be aware that atherosclerotic plaque rupture is not the only cause of acute myocardial infarction. In the case of septic vegetation embolisation, case report evidence reveals that adopting the current strategies used in the treatment of myocardial infarction can be dangerous. Thrombolysis risks intra-cerebral hemorrhage from mycotic aneurysm rupture. Percutaneous coronary intervention risks coronary mycotic aneurysm formation, stent infections as well as distal septic embolisation. As yet, there remains no defined treatment modality and we feel all cases should be referred to specialist cardiac centers to consider how best to proceed.
动脉粥样硬化斑块破裂继发的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死是一种常见的医疗急症。这种情况可通过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或溶栓有效处理。我们报告一例感染性心内膜炎患者因瓣膜赘生物冠状动脉栓塞继发急性心肌梗死的罕见病例,并强调对此现象的处理可能有所不同。
一名73岁的英国白人男性,既往有组织主动脉瓣置换史,被诊断为天然二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎并接受治疗。他在医院病情恶化,重复超声心动图显示赘生物迁移至主动脉瓣。在等待手术期间,我们的患者出现严重的中央压榨性胸痛,心电图显示前壁ST段抬高。我们的患者无缺血性心脏病病史或危险因素。很可能发生了赘生物部分的冠状动脉栓塞。在此情况下未进行溶栓或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并制定了紧急手术干预计划。然而,我们的患者病情迅速恶化,不幸死亡。
临床医生需要意识到动脉粥样硬化斑块破裂并非急性心肌梗死的唯一原因。在感染性赘生物栓塞的情况下,病例报告证据显示采用目前用于治疗心肌梗死的策略可能是危险的。溶栓有真菌性动脉瘤破裂导致脑出血的风险。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗有冠状动脉真菌性动脉瘤形成、支架感染以及远端感染性栓塞的风险。目前尚无明确的治疗方式,我们认为所有病例都应转诊至心脏专科中心,以考虑如何最佳地进行治疗。