Suppr超能文献

结肠手术中肠道准备有必要使用新霉素吗?口服新霉素加红霉素与红霉素-甲硝唑对比。

Is neomycin necessary for bowel preparation in surgery of the colon? Oral neomycin plus erythromycin versus erythromycin-metronidazole.

作者信息

Lewis R T, Goodall R G, Marien B, Lloyd-Smith W, Park M, Wiegand F M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, McGill University, PQ.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 1989 Jul;32(4):265-70.

PMID:2660973
Abstract

In 132 patients who underwent elective surgery of the colon, the value of bowel preparation with a conventional oral antibiotic preparation of neomycin-erythromycin (N-E) was compared with erythromycin-metronidazole (E-M). Of 125 patients who were available for assessment, 61 received N-E and 64 E-M. The two groups were evenly matched. Two wound infections occurred in patients receiving E-M, neither due to anaerobic bacteria, but seven wound infections developed in patients given N-E (p = 0.057), five of them caused by anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobic bacteria of the colon are the dominant cause of postoperative wound infection in elective surgery of the colon. Adequate antibiotic preparation directed against these bacteria makes the use of neomycin unnecessary.

摘要

在132例行择期结肠手术的患者中,将新霉素-红霉素(N-E)常规口服抗生素制剂进行肠道准备的效果与红霉素-甲硝唑(E-M)进行了比较。在125例可供评估的患者中,61例接受了N-E,64例接受了E-M。两组匹配良好。接受E-M的患者发生了2例伤口感染,均非由厌氧菌引起,但接受N-E的患者发生了7例伤口感染(p = 0.057),其中5例由厌氧菌引起。结肠厌氧菌是结肠择期手术术后伤口感染的主要原因。针对这些细菌进行充分的抗生素准备使得无需使用新霉素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验