Lewis R T, Goodall R G, Marien B, Lloyd-Smith W, Park M, Wiegand F M
Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, McGill University, PQ.
Can J Surg. 1989 Jul;32(4):265-70.
In 132 patients who underwent elective surgery of the colon, the value of bowel preparation with a conventional oral antibiotic preparation of neomycin-erythromycin (N-E) was compared with erythromycin-metronidazole (E-M). Of 125 patients who were available for assessment, 61 received N-E and 64 E-M. The two groups were evenly matched. Two wound infections occurred in patients receiving E-M, neither due to anaerobic bacteria, but seven wound infections developed in patients given N-E (p = 0.057), five of them caused by anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobic bacteria of the colon are the dominant cause of postoperative wound infection in elective surgery of the colon. Adequate antibiotic preparation directed against these bacteria makes the use of neomycin unnecessary.
在132例行择期结肠手术的患者中,将新霉素-红霉素(N-E)常规口服抗生素制剂进行肠道准备的效果与红霉素-甲硝唑(E-M)进行了比较。在125例可供评估的患者中,61例接受了N-E,64例接受了E-M。两组匹配良好。接受E-M的患者发生了2例伤口感染,均非由厌氧菌引起,但接受N-E的患者发生了7例伤口感染(p = 0.057),其中5例由厌氧菌引起。结肠厌氧菌是结肠择期手术术后伤口感染的主要原因。针对这些细菌进行充分的抗生素准备使得无需使用新霉素。