Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Nov;213(5):616-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
Postoperative complications are key outcomes of surgical procedures, but currently there is no uniform quantitative measure of complication severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and establish feasibility of quantitative morbidity scores for several common abdominal surgical procedures.
Using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, complications were identified in 5 common abdominal procedures for one institution in 2005-2008, including inguinal hernia, appendectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, hepatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Complications were graded by the 6-level "expanded" Accordion Severity Grading System. Quantification was performed using severity scores described previously.
Six hundred and seventy-six procedures were identified, including 88 patients (13.84%) who had complications and 5 patients (0.79%) who died. After severity weighting, the postoperative morbidity index (PMI) for each procedure was derived. An index of 0 would indicate no complication in any patient and an index of 1.000 would indicate that all operated patients died. PMIs were hernia repair 0.005; appendectomy 0.031; laparoscopic colectomy 0.082; hepatectomy 0.145; and pancreaticoduodenectomy 0.150. PMI of hepatectomy was greatly affected by the presence of a second procedure, ie, 0.070 without a second procedure and 0.427 with a second procedure. Weighted severity spectragrams were developed, portraying the impact of each grade of complication on overall morbidity.
Quantification of severity of postoperative complications is possible using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program methods and the Accordion Severity Grading System. Procedural PMI can be useful in assessing surgical outcomes. Certain limitations, particularly the need for risk adjustment, still need to be addressed.
术后并发症是手术程序的关键结果,但目前尚无统一的并发症严重程度定量衡量标准。本研究旨在评估和建立几种常见腹部手术定量发病率评分的可行性。
使用美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划的数据,确定了 2005 年至 2008 年一家机构的 5 种常见腹部手术(腹股沟疝、阑尾切除术、腹腔镜结直肠切除术、肝切除术和胰十二指肠切除术)的并发症。并发症采用 6 级“扩展”Accordion 严重程度分级系统进行分级。使用以前描述的严重程度评分进行量化。
共确定了 676 例手术,其中 88 例(13.84%)患者发生并发症,5 例(0.79%)患者死亡。经过严重程度加权后,得出了每种手术的术后发病率指数(PMI)。指数为 0 表示任何患者均无并发症,指数为 1.000 表示所有手术患者均死亡。PMI 为疝修补术 0.005;阑尾切除术 0.031;腹腔镜结直肠切除术 0.082;肝切除术 0.145;胰十二指肠切除术 0.150。肝切除术的 PMI 受第二手术的影响较大,即无第二手术时为 0.070,有第二手术时为 0.427。开发了加权严重度频谱图,描绘了每种并发症严重程度对整体发病率的影响。
使用美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划方法和 Accordion 严重程度分级系统,对术后并发症的严重程度进行量化是可行的。程序 PMI 可用于评估手术结果。仍需要解决某些局限性,特别是需要进行风险调整。