Newcastle University, School of Psychology, 4th Floor Ridley Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, England, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;31(7):1198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
Since its emergence in the early 1990s, a narrow but concentrated body of research has developed examining the role of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) in worry, and yet we still know little about its phenomenology. In an attempt to clarify our understanding of this construct, this paper traces the way in which our understanding and definition of IU have evolved throughout the literature. This paper also aims to further our understanding of IU by exploring the latent variables measures by the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS; Freeston, Rheaume, Letarte, Dugas & Ladouceur, 1994). A review of the literature surrounding IU confirmed that the current definitions are categorical and lack specificity. A critical review of existing factor analytic studies was carried out in order to determine the underlying factors measured by the IUS. Systematic searches yielded 9 papers for review. Two factors with 12 consistent items emerged throughout the exploratory studies, and the stability of models containing these two factors was demonstrated in subsequent confirmatory studies. It is proposed that these factors represent (i) desire for predictability and an active engagement in seeking certainty, and (ii) paralysis of cognition and action in the face of uncertainty. It is suggested that these factors may represent approach and avoidance responses to uncertainty. Further research is required to confirm the construct validity of these factors and to determine the stability of this structure within clinical samples.
自 20 世纪 90 年代初出现以来,已经有一小部分但集中的研究发展起来,研究了不确定性容忍度(IU)在担忧中的作用,但我们对其现象学仍然知之甚少。为了澄清我们对这一结构的理解,本文追溯了文献中 IU 的理解和定义的演变过程。本文还旨在通过探索不确定性容忍量表(IUS;Freeston、Rheaume、Letarte、Dugas 和 Ladouceur,1994)所测量的潜在变量,进一步加深我们对 IU 的理解。对 IU 相关文献的回顾证实,目前的定义是分类的,缺乏特异性。对现有的因素分析研究进行了批判性回顾,以确定 IUS 所测量的潜在因素。系统搜索产生了 9 篇可供审查的论文。在探索性研究中,有两个因素出现了 12 个一致的项目,随后的验证性研究也证明了包含这两个因素的模型的稳定性。有人提出,这些因素代表(i)对可预测性的渴望和积极寻求确定性,以及(ii)面对不确定性时认知和行动的瘫痪。有人认为,这些因素可能代表对不确定性的趋近和回避反应。需要进一步研究来确认这些因素的结构有效性,并确定该结构在临床样本中的稳定性。