Abteilung für Verhaltensneurobiologie, Max-Planck-Institut für Ornithologie, Eberhard-Gwinner-Str. Haus 6a, D-82319 Seewiesen, Germany.
Horm Behav. 2011 Nov;60(5):565-71. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
In many vertebrates testosterone increases during aggressive interactions and the surges in this hormone may be responsible for the winner effect. So far studies on this relationship have been done in captivity only, because simulating a winning situation for a territory owner in the field is difficult. However, an increasing number of studies show that territorial aggression is not necessarily accompanied by elevated testosterone after a single simulated territorial intrusion (STI) and therefore it has been proposed that STIs may even create a losing experience. We examined whether free-living male black redstarts (Phoenicurus ochruros) show changes in androgens, corticosterone and behavior following repeated STIs of high or low intensity and in contrast to being challenged only once. Repeated intrusions had no influence on androgen and corticosterone levels regardless of intrusion intensity. In contrast, the behavioral response changed over days depending on the intensity of the intrusion. Only birds challenged with high-level intruders approached the decoy significantly faster during the third intrusion than during the first one, stayed closer to the decoy, and sang more songs than males challenged with low-level intruders. Thus, although black redstarts reacted differently to STIs varying in frequency and intensity, these behavioral differences were not reflected in androgen or corticosterone levels. Our data show that it is unlikely that STIs induce a losing experience. Furthermore, they indicate that a hormonal effect of winning an encounter may not be universal in vertebrates and may depend on the ecological or life-history context.
在许多脊椎动物中,睾酮在攻击性互动中增加,这种激素的激增可能是胜利者效应的原因。到目前为止,这项研究只在圈养环境中进行过,因为在野外模拟领地所有者的胜利情况是很困难的。然而,越来越多的研究表明,领地侵略并不一定伴随着单次模拟领地入侵(STI)后睾酮水平的升高,因此有人提出,STI 甚至可能产生失败的体验。我们研究了自由生活的雄性红腹锦鸡(Phoenicurus ochruros)在多次高强度和低强度的 STI 后,以及与仅被挑战一次相比,其雄激素、皮质酮和行为是否会发生变化。无论入侵强度如何,重复入侵都不会影响雄激素和皮质酮水平。相反,行为反应会根据入侵强度的不同在几天内发生变化。只有受到高强度入侵者挑战的鸟类在第三次入侵时,比第一次入侵时更快地接近诱饵,更接近诱饵,并比受到低强度入侵者挑战的鸟类唱出更多的歌曲。因此,尽管红腹锦鸡对频率和强度不同的 STI 反应不同,但这些行为差异并没有反映在雄激素或皮质酮水平上。我们的数据表明,STI 不太可能导致失败的体验。此外,它们表明,在遇到胜利者时,激素的作用可能在脊椎动物中并不普遍,并且可能取决于生态或生活史背景。