Suppr超能文献

β 受体阻滞剂预防血液透析患者心源性猝死:HEMO 研究的倾向评分分析。

β-Blockers for prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients on hemodialysis: a propensity score analysis of the HEMO Study.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Seven Oaks General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Dec;58(6):939-45. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.06.024. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis patients have an elevated risk of sudden cardiac death. Although the efficacy of β-blockers for the prevention of sudden cardiac death has been proven in the general population, little evidence exists in patients with kidney failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Participants enrolled in the HEMO Study from May 1995 to February 2001.

INTERVENTION

β-Blocker use ascertained through self-reported questionnaires and dialysis clinic charts.

OUTCOMES

Sudden cardiac death adjudicated by a committee as a secondary outcome of interest.

MEASUREMENTS

We used Cox proportional hazards regression models, competing risk survival analysis, propensity score matching, and covariate adjustment to study the association of β-blockers with sudden cardiac death.

RESULTS

1,747 patients were included in this study, and 521 were on β-blocker therapy at baseline. Mean age was 58 years, 57% were women, and 39% had ischemic heart disease (IHD) at baseline. Baseline β-blocker use was not associated with lower risk of sudden cardiac death in univariate (cause-specific HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.64-1.24), multivariable (cause-specific HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.22), or propensity-matched (cause-specific HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.55-1.50) analyses. There was a significant interaction between β-blocker use and sudden cardiac death (interaction P = 0.03) in patients with (cause-specific HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.01) and without IHD (cause-specific HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.92-2.80).

LIMITATIONS

Observational nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In hemodialysis patients without preexisting IHD, β-blocker use was not associated with lower risk of sudden cardiac death. However, there was a trend toward benefit in those with IHD.

摘要

背景

血液透析患者发生心源性猝死的风险较高。尽管β受体阻滞剂已被证明可有效预防一般人群的心源性猝死,但在肾衰竭患者中的相关证据有限。

研究设计

血液透析(HEMO)研究的事后分析。

研究场所和参与者

本研究纳入了 1995 年 5 月至 2001 年 2 月期间参与 HEMO 研究的患者。

干预措施

β受体阻滞剂的使用情况通过自我报告的问卷和透析诊所的图表确定。

主要结局指标

委员会判定的心源性猝死作为次要终点。

测量方法

我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型、竞争风险生存分析、倾向评分匹配和协变量调整来研究β受体阻滞剂与心源性猝死的相关性。

结果

本研究共纳入 1747 例患者,其中 521 例患者在基线时使用β受体阻滞剂。平均年龄为 58 岁,57%为女性,39%的患者在基线时患有缺血性心脏病(IHD)。单因素分析(特异性 HR,0.89;95%CI,0.64-1.24)、多因素分析(特异性 HR,0.87;95%CI,0.62-1.22)和倾向评分匹配分析(特异性 HR,0.91;95%CI,0.55-1.50)均显示,基线时使用β受体阻滞剂与心源性猝死的风险降低无关。β受体阻滞剂的使用与心源性猝死之间存在显著的交互作用(交互 P=0.03),在患有(特异性 HR,0.65;95%CI,0.42-1.01)和不患有 IHD(特异性 HR,1.61;95%CI,0.92-2.80)的患者中均如此。

局限性

研究的观察性质。

结论

在没有既往 IHD 的血液透析患者中,β受体阻滞剂的使用与降低心源性猝死风险无关。然而,在患有 IHD 的患者中,β受体阻滞剂的使用有降低心源性猝死风险的趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验