Hundemer Gregory L, Sood Manish M, Canney Mark
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa, Canada.
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Dec 22;14(3):731-734. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa249. eCollection 2021 Mar.
In this issue of the , Wu present the results of a nationwide population-based study using Taiwanese administrative data to compare safety and efficacy outcomes with initiation of bisoprolol versus carvedilol among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for >90 days. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events over 2 years of follow-up. The study found that bisoprolol was associated with a lower risk for both major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared with carvedilol. While the bulk of the existing evidence favors a cardioprotective and survival benefit with β-blockers as a medication class among dialysis patients, there is wide heterogeneity among specific β-blockers in regard to pharmacologic properties and dialyzability. While acknowledging the constraints of observational data, these findings may serve to inform clinicians about the preferred β-blocker agent for dialysis patients to help mitigate cardiovascular risk and improve long-term survival for this high-risk population.
在本期的《 》中,吴等人呈现了一项基于全国人口的研究结果,该研究利用台湾行政数据,比较了接受维持性血液透析超过90天的患者起始使用比索洛尔与卡维地洛后的安全性和有效性结果。主要结局是2年随访期内的全因死亡率和主要不良心血管事件。研究发现,与卡维地洛相比,比索洛尔与主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率的较低风险相关。虽然现有大部分证据支持β受体阻滞剂作为一类药物在透析患者中具有心脏保护和生存益处,但特定β受体阻滞剂在药理特性和可透析性方面存在很大异质性。尽管认识到观察性数据的局限性,但这些发现可能有助于告知临床医生透析患者首选的β受体阻滞剂药物,以帮助降低该高危人群的心血管风险并改善长期生存。