• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用时间性侧翼任务研究反应选择的方式特异性。

Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):499-512. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0369-9. Epub 2011 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-011-0369-9
PMID:21874548
Abstract

The neurocognitive architecture for response selection is uncertain. Some theorists suggest that it is mediated by an amodal central mechanism, whereas others propose a set of independent control mechanisms. In a functional neuroimaging experiment, we investigated the nature of response selection by examining how its underlying brain mechanisms are affected by stimulus modality. To do this, we used a modified flanker task, in which the target and flanker (distractor) stimuli differed in time rather than space, making it accessible for both visual and auditory stimuli. As in the traditional flanker task, larger reaction times were observed for incongruent than congruent trials (i.e., a congruency effect) for both modalities. Congruency affected brain activation for both modalities in prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and the putamen. Modality-dependent activation was found in additional prefrontal and parietal regions for the visual modality and in left inferior prefrontal cortex for the auditory modality. Modality-dependent activity specifically related to response congruency was also found in sensory cortical regions. These data suggest that modality affects the brain regions throughout the cortex mediating response selection even for conceptually identical stimuli and tasks. They are consistent with the hypothesis that (at least partially) independent brain networks mediate response selection and that input modality may be a powerful factor for organizing neural activity to support task performance.

摘要

反应选择的神经认知架构尚不确定。一些理论家认为它是由一个非模态的中央机制介导的,而另一些人则提出了一组独立的控制机制。在一项功能神经影像学实验中,我们通过检查其潜在的大脑机制如何受到刺激模式的影响来研究反应选择的性质。为此,我们使用了一种改良的侧翼任务,其中目标和侧翼(干扰)刺激在时间上而不是空间上有所不同,这使得视觉和听觉刺激都可以使用。与传统的侧翼任务一样,对于两种模态,不一致的试验比一致的试验观察到更长的反应时间(即,一致性效应)。一致性对两种模态的前额叶皮层、顶叶皮层和纹状体的大脑激活都有影响。对于视觉模态,在前额叶和顶叶的额外区域发现了与模态相关的激活,对于听觉模态,在左侧下前额叶皮层也发现了与模态相关的激活。在感觉皮层区域还发现了与反应一致性具体相关的模态依赖性活动。这些数据表明,即使对于概念上相同的刺激和任务,模态也会影响介导反应选择的整个皮层中的大脑区域。它们与假设一致,即(至少部分)独立的大脑网络介导反应选择,并且输入模态可能是组织神经活动以支持任务表现的有力因素。

相似文献

1
Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task.使用时间性侧翼任务研究反应选择的方式特异性。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):499-512. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0369-9. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
2
On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task.在侧翼干扰任务执行过程中左右前额叶下部激活对言语/非言语模态的依赖性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Nov;20(11):2006-14. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20138.
3
Amodal processing in human prefrontal cortex.人类前额叶皮层的非模态加工。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 10;33(28):11573-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4601-12.2013.
4
The interplay of stimulus modality and response latency in neural network organization for simple working memory tasks.用于简单工作记忆任务的神经网络组织中刺激模态与反应潜伏期的相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 21;27(12):3187-97. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4963-06.2007.
5
The neural correlates of perceptual load induced attentional selection: an fMRI study.注意负载诱导的注意选择的神经相关:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuroscience. 2013 Oct 10;250:372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
6
The interplay of cue modality and response latency in brain areas supporting crossmodal motor preparation: an event-related fMRI study.在支持跨模态运动准备的大脑区域中,线索模态和反应时的相互作用:一项事件相关 fMRI 研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;214(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2745-5. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
7
Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.听觉和视觉信息的意象和提取:成功和失败表现的神经关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1730-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.051. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
8
Motivation by potential gains and losses affects control processes via different mechanisms in the attentional network.动机的潜在收益和损失通过注意网络中的不同机制影响控制过程。
Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:549-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.047. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
9
The neural basis of complex audiovisual objects maintenances in working memory.工作记忆中复杂视听客体维持的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107189. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
Hypo-activity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex relates to increased reaction time variability in patients with schizophrenia.背外侧前额叶皮层活动不足与精神分裂症患者反应时变异性增加有关。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101853. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101853. Epub 2019 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analytic evidence for the complex mechanisms underlying congruency sequence effect.关于一致性序列效应背后复杂机制的元分析证据。
Psychol Res. 2025 Mar 6;89(2):63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02093-5.
2
A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC).关于冲突任务的修正扩散模型(RDMC)的评论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):690-704. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02574-5. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
Resisting Visual, Phonological, and Semantic Interference - Same or Different Processes? A Focused Mini-Review.抵抗视觉、语音和语义干扰——相同还是不同的过程?一篇聚焦的小型综述。

本文引用的文献

1
The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control.序列调制的边界:集合级控制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1898-914. doi: 10.1037/a0024662. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.非自愿策略相关的双重任务表现。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):513-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0359-y. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
3
Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.任务转换中的中央交叉对话:来自输入-输出模态兼容性操纵的证据。
Psychol Belg. 2023 Apr 11;62(1):44-63. doi: 10.5334/pb.1184. eCollection 2023.
4
Action errors impair active working memory maintenance.动作错误会损害主动工作记忆的维持。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jun;151(6):1325-1340. doi: 10.1037/xge0001142. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.分析跨模态干扰效应的分布特性:机遇与挑战。
Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):387-99. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0551-y. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
Amodal processing in human prefrontal cortex.人类前额叶皮层的非模态加工。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 10;33(28):11573-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4601-12.2013.
7
Vision dominates at the preresponse level and audition dominates at the response level in cross-modal interaction: behavioral and neural evidence.在跨模态交互中,视觉在预反应水平占主导地位,听觉在反应水平占主导地位:行为和神经证据。
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;33(17):7109-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1985-12.2013.
8
Crossmodal action: modality matters.跨模态动作:模态很重要。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0373-0.
9
The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.输入-输出模态兼容性在任务转换中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):491-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
10
Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.双任务中刺激-反应模态配对的干扰效应及其稳健性。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):476-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0368-x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1075-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019695.
4
Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.超越感知的模块性:来自 PRP 范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Apr;36(2):395-414. doi: 10.1037/a0017174.
5
Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks.在四个不同的感觉运动任务中,绘制从感觉到运动的信息处理途径。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Dec;30(12):4167-86. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20837.
6
Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.注意模态间的转换:视觉优势的进一步证据。
Psychol Res. 2010 May;74(3):255-67. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0246-y. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.并行反应选择会干扰双任务条件下的序列学习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):270-90. doi: 10.1037/a0015378.
8
Neural evidence of a role for spatial response selection in the learning of spatial sequences.空间反应选择在空间序列学习中的作用的神经证据。
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 9;1247:114-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.097. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
9
Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain.人类大脑中多种冲突驱动的控制机制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
10
Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex.外侧前额叶皮质言语选择机制的功能磁共振成像研究
Neuroimage. 2008 Dec;43(4):801-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Jul 23.