Grégoire Coline, Majerus Steve
Psychology & Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Belgium.
Fund for Scientific Research FNRS, Belgium.
Psychol Belg. 2023 Apr 11;62(1):44-63. doi: 10.5334/pb.1184. eCollection 2023.
The unitary nature of resistance to interference (RI) processes remains a strongly debated question: are they central cognitive processes or are they specific to the stimulus domains on which they operate? This focused mini-review examines behavioral, neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence for and against domain-general RI processes, by distinguishing visual, verbal phonological and verbal semantic domains. Behavioral studies highlighted overall low associations between RI capacity across domains. Neuropsychological studies mainly report dissociations for RI abilities between the three domains. Neuroimaging studies highlight a left vs. right hemisphere distinction for verbal vs. visual RI, with furthermore distinct neural processes supporting phonological versus semantic RI in the left inferior frontal gyrus. While overall results appear to support the hypothesis of domain-specific RI processes, we discuss a number of methodological caveats that ask for caution in the interpretation of existing studies.
抗干扰(RI)过程的单一性仍然是一个备受争议的问题:它们是核心认知过程,还是特定于其作用的刺激领域?这篇重点迷你综述通过区分视觉、言语语音和言语语义领域,审视了支持和反对领域通用RI过程的行为、神经心理学和神经影像学证据。行为研究强调了各领域间RI能力的总体低相关性。神经心理学研究主要报告了这三个领域在RI能力上的分离。神经影像学研究突出了言语与视觉RI在左半球与右半球上的差异,此外,左下额叶回中支持语音与语义RI的神经过程也有所不同。虽然总体结果似乎支持领域特定RI过程的假设,但我们讨论了一些方法上的注意事项,这些注意事项要求在解释现有研究时保持谨慎。