• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The teams of early-career investigators: A qualitative pilot study.早期职业研究人员团队:一项定性试点研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Oct;2(5):321-326. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.335.
2
Developing a team science workshop for early-career investigators.为初出茅庐的研究人员开发一个团队科学研讨会。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jul 29;3(4):184-189. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.391. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
Improving clinical and translational research training: a qualitative evaluation of the Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute KL2-mentored research scholars program.改善临床与转化研究培训:对亚特兰大临床与转化科学研究所KL2指导的研究学者项目的定性评估
J Investig Med. 2017 Jan;65(1):23-31. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000143. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
4
Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.优化学术医疗中心的团队科学:对研究者观点的定性研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 23;7(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.3. eCollection 2023.
5
Supporting early career health investigators in Kenya: A qualitative study of HIV/AIDS research capacity building.支持肯尼亚早期职业健康研究人员:一项关于艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究能力建设的定性研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Mar 2;20:192. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.192.5964. eCollection 2015.
6
Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators.理解临床与转化研究人员的职业成功及其影响因素。
Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):570-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000979.
7
Visiting Scholars Program to enhance career development among early-career KL2 investigators in Clinical and Translational Science: Implications from a quality improvement assessment.临床与转化科学领域早期职业KL2研究人员职业发展提升访问学者计划:质量改进评估的启示
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 14;5(1):e67. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.564.
8
Interprofessional Healthcare Teams in the Military: A Scoping Literature Review.军队中的跨专业医疗团队:一项范围界定文献综述
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e448-e454. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy087.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Understanding the distinct experience of rural interprofessional collaboration in developing palliative care programs.了解农村跨专业合作在制定姑息治疗计划方面的独特经验。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(2):2711. Epub 2014 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework.利用威斯康星团队科学框架中的干预措施开发一个转化团队培训项目。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 19;7(1):e233. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.649. eCollection 2023.
2
Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.采用团队科学方法进行研究的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04619-0.
3
Developing a team science workshop for early-career investigators.为初出茅庐的研究人员开发一个团队科学研讨会。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jul 29;3(4):184-189. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.391. eCollection 2019 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.通过组合任务角色分配和目标结构策略来弥合团队断层线。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):407-20. doi: 10.1037/a0025231. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
2
Advancing the science of team science.推进团队科学的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x.
3
A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.多层次系统视角的团队科学研究。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.
4
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.团队科学的生态学:理解跨学科合作的情境影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
5
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
6
Differences between experienced and inexperienced teachers' planning decisions, interactions, student engagement, and instructional climate.经验丰富和经验不足的教师在规划决策、互动、学生参与度和教学氛围方面的差异。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991 Jun;62(2):196-204. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608710.

早期职业研究人员团队:一项定性试点研究。

The teams of early-career investigators: A qualitative pilot study.

作者信息

Norman Marie K, Hamm Megan E, Mayowski Colleen A, Schenker Yael, Kapoor Wishwa N

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Center for Research on Health Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Oct;2(5):321-326. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.335.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2018.335
PMID:30828474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6390388/
Abstract

Early team experiences can influence the professional trajectories of early-career investigators profoundly, yet they remain underexplored in the team science literature, which has focused primarily on large, multisite teams led by established researchers. To better understand the unique challenges of teams led by early-career investigators, we conducted a qualitative pilot study. Interviews were conducted with the principal investigator and members of 5 teams led by KL2 and K12 scholars at the University of Pittsburgh. A code book was developed and thematic analysis was conducted. Seven distinct themes emerged. Interview subjects reported a high level of trust and strong communication patterns on their teams; however, the data also suggested underlying tensions that have the potential to escalate into larger problems if unaddressed. This study yields a deeper understanding of teams led by early-career investigators, which can help us provide appropriately targeted training and support.

摘要

早期的团队经历会深刻影响初出茅庐的研究者的职业轨迹,但在团队科学文献中,这些经历仍未得到充分探索,相关文献主要聚焦于由资深研究者领导的大型多地点团队。为了更好地理解初出茅庐的研究者所领导团队面临的独特挑战,我们开展了一项定性试点研究。我们对匹兹堡大学由KL2和K12学者领导的5个团队的首席研究员及成员进行了访谈。我们编制了一本编码手册并进行了主题分析。出现了七个不同的主题。访谈对象报告称他们所在团队有高度的信任和强大的沟通模式;然而,数据也表明存在潜在的紧张关系,如果不加以解决,有可能升级为更大的问题。这项研究使我们对初出茅庐的研究者所领导的团队有了更深入的理解,这有助于我们提供有针对性的培训和支持。