Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):239-46. doi: 10.1177/1545968311419301. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) is an experimental treatment intended to improve hand function after stroke.
To compare the effects of 6 weeks of CCFES versus cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on upper extremity impairment and activity limitation in patients ≤6 months poststroke.
Twenty-one participants were randomized to CCFES or cyclic NMES. Treatment for both groups consisted of daily stimulation-assisted repetitive hand-opening exercise at home plus twice-weekly lab sessions of functional task practice. Assessments were made at pretreatment and posttreatment and at 1 month and 3 months posttreatment. They included maximum voluntary finger extension angle, finger movement tracking error, upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score, Box and Blocks test, and Arm Motor Abilities test. Treatment effects were estimated using a 2-factor repeated measures analysis of variance with the value of the baseline measure as a covariate.
Seventeen patients completed the treatment phase (9 CCFES, 8 cyclic NMES). At all posttreatment time points, CCFES produced larger improvements than cyclic NMES on every outcome measure. Maximum voluntary finger extension showed the largest treatment effect, with a mean group difference across the posttreatment time points of 28° more finger extension for CCFES.
The results favor CCFES over cyclic NMES though the small sample size limits the statistical power of the study. The effect size estimates from this study will be used to power a larger trial.
对侧控制功能性电刺激(CCFES)是一种旨在改善脑卒中后手部功能的实验性治疗方法。
比较 6 周 CCFES 与循环神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对脑卒中后≤6 个月患者上肢损伤和活动受限的影响。
21 名参与者被随机分配到 CCFES 或循环 NMES 组。两组的治疗均包括在家中进行日常刺激辅助的重复手部张开运动,以及每周两次在实验室进行功能性任务练习。评估在治疗前、治疗后以及治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月进行。评估内容包括最大自主手指伸展角度、手指运动跟踪误差、上肢 Fugl-Meyer 评分、Box 和 Blocks 测试和上肢运动能力测试。使用具有基线测量值作为协变量的 2 因素重复测量方差分析估计治疗效果。
17 名患者完成了治疗阶段(9 名 CCFES,8 名循环 NMES)。在所有治疗后时间点,CCFES 在每个结果测量上都比循环 NMES 产生更大的改善。最大自主手指伸展显示出最大的治疗效果,CCFES 在治疗后时间点的平均组间差异为手指伸展增加 28°。
尽管样本量小限制了研究的统计效力,但结果支持 CCFES 优于循环 NMES。本研究的效应量估计将用于为更大规模的试验提供动力。